How Can Relative Permittivity Be Measured in the Stratosphere?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the measurement of relative permittivity in the stratosphere, particularly in the context of a competition project involving a balloon flight. Participants explore the effects of temperature, pressure, and humidity on permittivity, as well as the challenges of measuring these variables at high altitudes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Filip expresses interest in measuring how relative permittivity changes with temperature, pressure, and humidity during a balloon flight to the stratosphere.
  • Some participants suggest that significant changes in permittivity may not occur until altitudes of around 50 km, where the ionosphere begins.
  • There is a discussion about the feasibility of measuring temperature directly as a simpler alternative to measuring permittivity.
  • One participant mentions a formula related to air parameters that could potentially link pressure and temperature to permittivity.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for careful experimental procedures due to expected small changes in permittivity at radio frequencies.
  • Filip receives advice to use a plate capacitor to measure capacitance during the flight, which could allow for the calculation of permittivity.
  • Questions arise regarding the relationship between permittivity and breakdown voltage, with references to specific formulas that involve temperature and pressure.
  • There is a suggestion to measure ion density or ionizing radiation at high altitudes as an alternative approach, which could also impress competition judges.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method to measure relative permittivity or the significance of changes at the proposed altitude. Multiple competing views and suggestions remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the formulas for permittivity do not explicitly include temperature and pressure, indicating potential limitations in the proposed methods. Additionally, the discussion includes references to empirical data and specific coefficients related to breakdown voltage calculations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and hobbyists interested in experimental physics, electronics, and atmospheric science, particularly those involved in high-altitude balloon projects.

Filip1997
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
So I am a 17 years old student who is interested in electronics and programming them (I am expirienced with Arduino).
I and my friends decided that we will join a competition for all technical schools in my country. The goal of the competition is to make a project that will do something while it is flying with a balloon to the stratosphere.
I had the idea to measure how the relative permittivity will change as the temperature, pressure and the humidity changes. But I have a few problems my teachers don't know how to measure it when you are looking on temperature and those factors. I have basic electronic knowledge and good programming skills (I know about electronic, currents and lot more because I am going to a technical school and we learned all).

So if anyone knows how I could make that I would like to know.

Thank you all, Filip.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Filip1997 said:
I had the idea to measure how the relative permittivity will change as the temperature, pressure and the humidity changes. .
I wouldn't expect significant/measurable change in permittivity before altitudes like 50 km, when one enters ionosphere. Ionosphere permittivity depends on frequency. How high can balloon climb?
 
Well, air pressure will go down, but measuring temperature directly sounds much easier.
 
zoki85 said:
I wouldn't expect significant/measurable change in permittivity before altitudes like 50 km, when one enters ionosphere. Ionosphere permittivity depends on frequency. How high can balloon climb?

The balloon will go 30 km to statosphere I found on wikipedia that the pressure at a height of 30 km is 1/1000 of watter level pressure, is there really nothing to measure if the pressure and temperature (-60 celzius) change?

Mfb what do you mean measuring temperature I know how to do it but how to get permiitivity out of that I know some formulas for permittivity but they don't include temperature and preasure but I found something about "Related parameters of air" and I found a formula for delta that says:

(pressure1 / pressure0) * ((273 + t0) / (273 + t1))
 
Filip1997 said:
The balloon will go 30 km to statosphere I found on wikipedia that the pressure at a height of 30 km is 1/1000 of watter level pressure, is there really nothing to measure if the pressure and temperature (-60 celzius) change?
At radio frequencies, expected changes are probably in order of a promile or less. Great experimental care is required to make measurements accurately.
 
Filip1997 said:
Mfb what do you mean measuring temperature I know how to do it but how to get permiitivity out of that I know some formulas for permittivity but they don't include temperature and preasure but I found something about "Related parameters of air" and I found a formula for delta that says:

(pressure1 / pressure0) * ((273 + t0) / (273 + t1))
I suggest to measure the temperature instead of the electric permittivity.
 
mfb said:
I suggest to measure the temperature instead of the electric permittivity.

Yes but its a competition and for measuring temperature is only one tiny component needed.. I don't think that we would win a good place :D

I got some help from a friend who is studdying electronics he sayed that I should make a plate capacitor and measure the capcivity while its flying and I could get permittivity from a simple formula :D ty all for replays
 
Filip1997 said:
I got some help from a friend who is studdying electronics he sayed that I should make a plate capacitor and measure the capcivity while its flying and I could get permittivity from a simple formula :D ty all for replays
The make it and measure it real goood:D
 
Hi all one more question if I get permittivity and I measured teamperature, humidity, pressure is there any formula so I can caculate how much voltage is needed for electrical breakdown?
 
  • #10
Filip1997 said:
Hi all one more question if I get permittivity and I measured teamperature, humidity, pressure is there any formula so I can caculate how much voltage is needed for electrical breakdown?
Permittivity has nothing to do with breakdown voltage. Temperature and pressure does. If in uniform E-field, at temperature ϑ=20 °C and pressure p= 1013 mbar, breakdown voltage equals Vb, then, at some other temperature ϑ and pressure p, breakdown voltage is:
V'b=Vb⋅0.289p/(273+ϑ)
 
  • #11
First thank you zoki and sorry if I am being stupid but can you give me a example I don't see the whole picture (sorry if it is obviously). I see the formula and I see Vb' and Vb at the end I would get V'b = (some number) Vb?
 
  • #12
Filip1997 said:
I see the formula and I see Vb' and Vb at the end I would get V'b = (some number) Vb?
Yes. To calculate "some number" p should be in mbar, ϑ in °C.
 
  • #13
So I can do it like this Vb' = 3 * 106 (because Vb of air is 3MV/m) * 0.289p/(273+ϑ). Right?

Lets say temperature in statophere is -60 celzius, and I found out thet the pressure is 1013hPa / 1000 (at the heightest point of statophere)

Example Vb' = 3000000 * ((0.289 * 101300)/(273 - 60))
Vb' = 3000000 * (101.3/ 213)
Vb' = 3000000 * 0.475
Vb' = 1426760,56 V

P.S: What is this 0.289 number?

Thank you for helping me!
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Filip1997 said:
So I can do it like this Vb' = 3 * 106 (because Vb of air is 3MV/m) * 0.289p/(273+ϑ). Right?
Seems you're confusing breakdown voltage Vb and breakdown field Eb. Relation between these two in uniform filed is Vb=EbxD , where D is distance between flat plate electrodes. Breakdown E-field of standard air is about 3 MV/m, a bit more or less depends on D. Breakdown voltage in kV of standard air you calculate as:
Vb=24.24⋅D + 6.08⋅√D
where D is distance measured in cm between parallel plates.
 
  • #15
Thank you. Can you explain me what 24.24 is and what is 6.08? I have to document all the steps of my project.
 
  • #16
The variation in permittivity of the air would be less than the thermal expansion / contraction of the capacitive measurement plates needed.

The charged particle or ion density is one possible parameter that could be measured. At low altitudes, air pollution might provide most ions, while as height increases, the greater ionisation by solar UV radiation would generate significantly more ions. There would be pollution level and day / night variations in ion density.
To measure ion concentration you would need a few hundred volts to attract and collect ions from an airflow drawn through a passage. The ion current could be converted to a voltage using a low leakage MOSFET Op-Amp in an electrometer with a high value feedback resistor.
 
  • #17
Filip1997 said:
Thank you. Can you explain me what 24.24 is and what is 6.08? I have to document all the steps of my project.
Sorry, but I have detailed reference only in my language. These coefficients and the equation are derived by fitting to empirical data concerning research of so called "Paschen's curve" for air. See here what is that curve or just google words "Paschen's curves", "Paschen's law"...
 
  • #18
Thank you all for your help I will now collect as much information as I can and try to figure out something awesome!

You all are awesome, Filip.
 
  • #19
The permittivity of the atmosphere in the ionosphere is based on the ionisation.I have a feeling that the presence of capacitor plates of a practical size and spacing and the associated circuit could affect the ionisation levels. Did you consider measuring the presence of ionising particles or radiation (UV?) at high altitude, instead? That might be a possibility and impress the judges.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
  • #20
sophiecentaur said:
The permittivity of the atmosphere in the ionosphere is based on the ionisation.I have a feeling that the presence of capacitor plates of a practical size and spacing and the associated circuit could affect the ionisation levels. Did you consider measuring the presence of ionising particles or radiation (UV?) at high altitude, instead? That might be a possibility and impress the judges.

Yes sphiencentaur I am going to make a ion chamber with my team so we can meassure the radiation I saw how it schoud look like and I will read about it today. Do you have expirience with ion chambers so I can ask you if I get any problems?
 
  • #21
The old standard for detecting/measuring ionizing radiation uses a Giger-Müller tube. You'll need some way to store counts/time at different altitudes?
 
  • #22
dlgoff said:
The old standard for detecting/measuring ionizing radiation uses a Giger-Müller tube. You'll need some way to store counts/time at different altitudes?

I thought of meassuring voltage that comes from the ions by a module and saving it into a sd card. Do you have a better way?
 
Last edited:
  • #23
Filip1997 said:
Do you have expirience with ion chambers so I can ask you if I get any problems?
'Fraid not. Not my field. But there is bound to be a PF member who can answer any specific questions.
 
  • #24
Filip1997 said:
I thought of meassuring voltage that comes from the ions by a module and saving it into a sd card. Do you have a better way?
From my experience, counting events is the usual way. Scintillation counters is one way that I'm familiar with and have used. There are chemical cocktails that will do for Liquid Scintillation counting.

Saving to an sd card sounds right to me.
 
  • #25
Scintillation counting can get quite involved.

You can use a closed chamber and measure incident radiation.
Or you can use an open flow chamber and measure the charge of ions available per m3 of air.

What height is the balloon expected to reach?
 
  • #26
Baluncore said:
Scintillation counting can get quite involved.
What height is the balloon expected to reach?

It will reach 30km.

What is better to measure the incident radiation or the flaw. Can I measure the uv radiation with closed chamber method?
 
  • #27
Cosmic rays and high energy particles can be counted with closed chambers or scintillation counters. Atmospheric absorption can be predicted from air density, so it is probably easier to monitor closer to sea level and at a few thousand feet, then predict absorption. A balloon is not really needed.

Immediate incident UV radiation is best measured directly using a semiconductor diode detector, there is no need to measure it indirectly using a chamber. It is the simplest single parameter to record.

Atmospheric chemistry will be effected by the availability of ionised molecules in the air. That ion charge density can be measured from air flow through an open chamber. An electric field separates the ions and so measures the ions as current. It is a general technique that will indicate ionised pollutants, ozone and the effects of UV and ionising radiation.

Maximum natural ozone concentration can be expected near 25km.The biggest problem with any electronics will be the typical temperature of minus 57°C found between about 5km and the maximum balloon altitude of 30km.

Above 30km the temperature gradually rises again to near zero°C at 50km, along with a very significant increase in ionisation. But the balloon will not get there.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K