How can the Equivalence Principle hold when we consider tidal forces?

In summary: It's not a principle of minimal coupling, but it still holds in the presence of non-uniformities in the gravitational field.
  • #1
Bernard
11
0
Tidal Forces: "It arises because the gravitational force exerted by one body on another is not constant across it". which implicitly implies that the acceleration is not constant on that body.

Equivalence Principle: "weightlessness sensation occurs when one free falls in gravity" - which implies that in an upright position, you don't feel your feet accelerating more than your head in a large gravitational field such as that of a black hole, which is a contradiction in itself.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The equivalence principle only holds over regions of spacetime small enough that tidal effects are negligible. So your second paragraph describes a situation where the equivalence principle is not expected to apply.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #3
Bernard said:
Equivalence Principle: "weightlessness sensation occurs when one free falls in gravity" - which implies that in an upright position, you don't feel your feet accelerating more than your head in a large gravitational field such as that of a black hole, which is a contradiction in itself.
If you use a standard textbook definition then you will see that this is not how the equivalence principle is described. You will either see the explicit limitation to uniform gravitational fields, the absence of tidal forces, or the term "local".
 
  • #4
Dale said:
If you use a standard textbook definition then you will see that this is not how the equivalence principle is described. You will either see the explicit limitation to uniform gravitational fields, the absence of tidal forces, or the term "local".
So this only holds in uniform gravitational fields. Now Earth does not have a uniform gravitational field (since field lines are not parallel and tidal forces can be seen on earth). Then why do we need to correct our time on the GPS satellites due to general relativity if the slow running of clocks is implied by the strong EP which does not hold since our gravitational field is radial?
 
  • #5
GR is more than just the equivalence principle. GR holds over non-local regions of space time, even when the equivalence principle does not.

The equivalence is just a tool to help people figure out what the laws of physics should look like in GR based on what we know on a local scale.
 
  • #6
Bernard said:
So this only holds in uniform gravitational fields.

No, it holds over a region of spacetime small enough that non-uniformities in the field cannot be detected.

Bernard said:
the slow running of clocks is implied by the strong EP

The fact that the strong EP implies the slow running of clocks does not mean slow running of clocks is not present in circumstances when the strong EP cannot be applied. Slow running of clocks--or more precisely different proper times along different worldlines in spacetime--is a much more general phenomenon.
 
  • #7
If it comes to the question, what the equivalence principle really means, my feeling is that the only precise meaning of the weak principle is that the spacetime manifold is a 4D pseudo-Riemannian space, and at any point of space time the tangent space is a Minkowski space, i.e., the pseudometric is of signature (1,3) (or equivalently (3,1) depending on the sign conventions chosen). This implies that at any point there's a local inertial frame, where any local (!) law of physics takes the form of that law in special relativity. Only at the very point where you use such a "free-falling rotation free reference frame" you don't have gravity. Practically it's approximately true with some precision only for regions small compared to any curvature measure at this point.
 
  • Like
Likes martinbn and Dale
  • #8
Bernard said:
Tidal Forces: "It arises because the gravitational force exerted by one body on another is not constant across it". which implicitly implies that the acceleration is not constant on that body.

Equivalence Principle: "weightlessness sensation occurs when one free falls in gravity" - which implies that in an upright position, you don't feel your feet accelerating more than your head in a large gravitational field such as that of a black hole, which is a contradiction in itself.

There are (at least) two forms of the equivalence principle.

1. The equivalence principle applies only locally, and fails when curvature and tidal forces are considered.
http://www.pmaweb.caltech.edu/Courses/ph136/yr2012/ (see section 25.7)
http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2011-7/fulltext.html (se section 9.5 and the discussion about local flatness)

2. The equivalence principle applies exactly to all of general relativity when it is taken to be the principle of minimal coupling (in the action).
http://www.blau.itp.unibe.ch/newlecturesGR.pdf (sections 5.1-5.4)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #9
I'd say 2. is even the strong equivalence principle.
 
  • #10
atyy said:
2. The equivalence principle applies exactly to all of general relativity when it is taken to be the principle of minimal coupling (in the action).
http://www.blau.itp.unibe.ch/newlecturesGR.pdf (sections 5.1-5.4)

I think section 1.1 Motivation. Einstein's equivalence principle is more relevant to this discussion.
 

Related to How can the Equivalence Principle hold when we consider tidal forces?

1. How does the Equivalence Principle relate to tidal forces?

The Equivalence Principle states that the effects of gravity are indistinguishable from the effects of acceleration. This means that objects in free fall experience the same acceleration, regardless of their mass or composition. Tidal forces, which are caused by the gravitational pull of massive objects like planets and stars, also follow this principle.

2. Why is it important for the Equivalence Principle to hold when considering tidal forces?

The Equivalence Principle is important because it allows us to understand and predict the behavior of objects in gravitational fields. It also helps us to reconcile the laws of gravity with the principles of special relativity, which state that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion.

3. Can the Equivalence Principle be applied to all types of tidal forces?

Yes, the Equivalence Principle applies to all types of tidal forces, whether they are caused by the gravitational pull of a planet, a star, or any other massive object. This is because all tidal forces are a result of the curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of massive objects.

4. How does the Equivalence Principle affect our understanding of gravity?

The Equivalence Principle is a fundamental concept in understanding gravity. It allows us to view gravity not as a force between objects, but as a curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of massive objects. This perspective has been crucial in developing our modern understanding of gravity through theories like general relativity.

5. Are there any exceptions to the Equivalence Principle when considering tidal forces?

While the Equivalence Principle holds true in most situations, there are some exceptions when considering tidal forces. For example, in extremely strong gravitational fields, such as those near a black hole, the Equivalence Principle may break down and objects may experience different accelerations depending on their mass and composition. Additionally, the Equivalence Principle does not apply in non-inertial reference frames, where objects may experience fictitious forces in addition to the gravitational force.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
982
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
60
Views
6K
Back
Top