How can the l1 norm of a linear function be maximized?

  • Thread starter Thread starter humbug
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Norm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on maximizing the L1 norm of a linear function defined as z = c + Ax, where the goal is to optimize x to maximize the sum of absolute values of z. The user notes that traditional methods like the simplex algorithm are ineffective for this maximization. They suggest that the separating hyperplane theorem might be relevant but are unsure how to apply it. A proposed approach involves setting all but one element of x to zero, although this is only valid when c equals zero. The user also seeks clarification on handling cases where c is a constant vector and discusses the implications of convexity in relation to the bounds of x.
humbug
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Sorry if this is in the wrong section...first time and i couldn't see a convex analysis section.

I'm trying to find a good algorithm/theorem that will maximise the l1 norm (sum of absolute values) of a linear function. Namely, given a function z = c + Ax where z is (nx1), A is (nxm) and x is (mx1), what is the optimal way to choose x such that the sum of the absolute values of z are maximised (obviously x is bounded).

My problem scales really badly so its not feasible to just compute at the bounds of x and choose the biggest outcome. I've also found that the simplex algorithm cannot do it (it only works for minimising the l1 norm). I think the separating hyperplane theorem might be able to help but i can't really see how.

Any help/ideas would be greatly appreciated
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think this will work - just make all but one element of x equal to zero. With the position of the one nonzero element corresponding to the column of A which has the maximum L1 norm.

Edit : Ok scrub that, it's only correct for c=0.

BTW c is a vector (nx1) isn't it?
 
Last edited:
In general c is a vector (nx1), however one of my cases deals with c being a constant vector so any thoughts on how to deal with that would also be helpful. As I understand it, if each element of x is in the interval [a,b], then shouldn't x be populated with a and b only? I thought that since the abs function is convex then its maximum will lie at the bounds always (or in other words, the solution lies at the corner of some hypercube). You can use this argument to turn the problem into a binomial choice problem if that makes things easier (thats what I'm playing with at the moment but it hasn't made it easier for me yet)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top