How can the Poisson distribution be rewritten in terms of P(X <= 1)?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Poisson distribution, specifically the expression for P(X = x) and its relationship to P(X ≤ 1). Participants are tasked with exploring how the Poisson distribution can be rewritten in terms of cumulative probabilities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate the Poisson probability mass function to the cumulative probability P(X ≤ 1) and questions the validity of their reasoning regarding the sum of probabilities.
  • Some participants question the assumptions made about the relationship between P(X = x) and the sum of probabilities, particularly regarding the interpretation of specific values of λ.
  • Others suggest examining the implications of the equality P(X ≤ 1) = 1 - e^{-λ} and how it connects to the definitions of the Poisson distribution.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the Poisson distribution and its properties. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the probability distribution, but there is no explicit consensus on the rewriting of the expression.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential misunderstandings about the properties of the exponential function and its role in the Poisson distribution. There are also indications of confusion regarding the limits of summation and the specific values of λ in the context of the problem.

Bob19
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Hello I'm Presented with the following Poisson distribution question

[tex]P(X = x) = \frac{e^{-\lambda} \cdot \lambda^{x}}{x!}[/tex]

where [tex]x \in (1,2,3,\ldots)[/tex] and [tex]\lambda > 0[/tex]

Then I'm suppose to show that the above can be re-written if

[tex]P(X \leq 1) = 1 - e^{- \lambda}[/tex]

Any idears on how I do that?

I'm told [tex]\sum_{x=0} ^ {\infty} p(x) = \frac{e^{- \lambda} \cdot \lambda^{x}}{x!} = e^{- \lambda} \sum _{x=0} ^{\infty} \frac{\lambda ^{x}}{x!}[/tex]

if [tex]\lambda ^{x} = 1[/tex]

then [tex]p(x) = e^{- \lambda}[/tex]

This must give [tex]P(X \leq 1) = 1- e^{- \lambda}[/tex]

Can anybody please tell me if I'm on the right track here?

Sincerley Bob
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bob19 said:
Hello I'm Presented with the following Poisson distribution question
[tex]P(X = x) = \frac{e^{-\lambda} \cdot \lambda^{x}}{x!}[/tex]
where [tex]x \in (1,2,3,\ldots)[/tex] and [tex]\lambda > 0[/tex]
Then I'm suppose to show that the above can be re-written if
[tex]P(X \leq 1) = 1 - e^{- \lambda}[/tex]
Any idears on how I do that?
I'm told [tex]\frac{e^{- \lambda} \cdot \lambda^{x}}{x!} = e^{- \lambda} \sum _{x=0} ^{\infty} \frac{\lambda ^{x}}{x!} = e^{- \lambda} e^{\lambda} = 1[/tex]
Then if [tex]\lambda ^{x} = 1[/tex]
No, you are not told that! Obviously
[tex]\frac{e^{- \lambda} \cdot \lambda^{x}}{x!}[/tex]
,for specific x, is not the same as sum for all x:
[tex]e^{- \lambda} \sum _{x=0} ^{\infty} \frac{\lambda ^{x}}{x!}[/tex]
What you are told is that the sum for all x is equal to 1: so that this is a valid probability distribution.
Since x can only take on positive integer values, [itex]P(x \leq 1)[/itex] is exactly the same as [itex]P(x= 1)[/itex] which is
[tex]\frac{e^{-\lambda}\lambda^1}{1!}= \lambda e^{-\lambda}[/tex]
Assuming, as you say, that that is [itex]1- e^{-\lambda}[/itex], then you are not told that [itex]e^{\lambda}= 1[/itex]. You are told, rather, that [itex]e^{\lamba}= 1+ \lambda[/itex] so that
P(X= x) can be written as
[tex]P(X= x)= \frac{e^{-\lamba}\lamba^x}{x!}= \frac{\lamba^x}{(1+\lambda)x!}[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello Hall and Thank You,

x = 1

then [tex]\frac{e^{-\lamba}\lamba^1}{1!}= \frac{\lamba^1}{(1+ 1)1!} = e^{- \lambda}[/tex]

Which is then [tex]P(x \geq 1) = 1- e^{- \lambda}[/tex]

Am I on the right track now ?

Sincerely
Bob
 
Last edited:
I don't know why the Latex isn't showing properly. What I was trying to say was that IF P(X<= 1)= P(X= 1)= lambda e-lambda is equal to 1- e-lambda, then multiplying both sides of the equation by elamba we have lambda= elambda- 1 or elambda= lambda + 1.

Now to "rewrite" P(x)= (lambdaxe-lambda/x!, just replace that e-lambda bu 1/(lambda+ 1), getting P(x)= lambdax/(x!(lambda+ 1)).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
558
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K