How can the power rule be used to differentiate fractions in a simpler way?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiation of functions involving fractional powers, specifically focusing on the expression 1 - x^(1/2). Participants explore the application of the power rule and the challenges of using the definition of the derivative for such functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to differentiate the function using the definition but encounters difficulties with fractional powers and the limit process. Questions arise about the treatment of constants during differentiation and whether they can be ignored.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering various approaches to simplify the differentiation process. Some guidance has been provided regarding the linearity of differentiation, though there remains some confusion about the implications of this concept and how it applies to the original problem.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the proper handling of constants in differentiation and the application of the power rule versus the limit definition. Participants express uncertainty about the simplification steps and the cancellation of terms in the context of limits.

DorumonSg
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Its more a simplifying problem...

I was trying to differentiate this using definition principal

1-x^1/2

But I got stuck here :

(1-(x+h)^1/2 - (1-x^1/2))/h

I mean how do you explan something to the power of half or infact any fraction? I know I can change it to 1/sqrt(x+h)... but it just makes things more complicated... coz I can't get rid of the h then...

But using power rule is simple... 1-x^1/2 = -1/2X^-1/2

On top of that, I want to ask... are the constant numbers ignorable in differentiation? For example 4 - x^2 is -2x, I can just apply power rule on -x^2 and get the same answer... If I were to differentiate this by definition, can I just do -x^2 and ignore 4 too?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
write sqrt(x+h)-sqrt(x) as
[(x+h)-x]/[sqrt(x+h)+sqrt(x)]
by using
a-b=(a^2-b^2)/(a+b)

We do not ignor constants, but differentiation is linear that is
(a f+b g)'=a f'+b g'
when a and b are constants and f and g are functions
 
Last edited:
write sqrt(x+h)-sqrt(x) as
[(x+h)-x]/[sqrt(x+h)+sqrt(x)]
by using
a-b=(a^2-b^2)/(a+b)

Erm... so I am guessing you canceled the 1 away already before coming to this step? But if I do this its a fraction over h...

Coz the equation will become {[(x+h)-x]/[sqrt(x+h)+sqrt(x)]}/h and I still don't know how to get rid of h...

We do not ignor constants, but differentiation is linear that is
(a f+b g)'=a f'+b g'
when a and b are constants and f and g are functions

Erm... don't understand. Well I just did a differentiation using definition just now, and I realized you cannot remove the constant beforehand but when using Power Rule, it seems it can be ignored.

And how do you tell if it linear anyway?
 
What does (x+h)-x simplify to? After that, can you cancel the h?
 
-yes I canceled the one
-the h's cancel after the x's cancel in (x+h)-x
-one can prove the differentiation is linear or take it as an axiom
have you seen limit theorems like
lim[a f(x)]=a lim f(x)
and
lim [f(x)+g(x)]=lim f(x)+lim g(x)
if so it will be easy to show
(a f+b g)'=a f'+b g'
by using the limit definition of differentiation
-can you finish the differentiation of sqrt(x)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K