How Can the Stability of a Kapitza Pendulum Be Demonstrated?

HansBu
Messages
24
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
I am having confusion with regards to the proof of my problem. This involves a pendulum with harmonically driven pivot and the task is to show that the pendulum is stable in the inverted position when the amplitude of the driving acceleration is sufficiently high. For reference, consider the problem below.

> Consider a pendulum with harmonically driven pivot. The equation of motion is
$$\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2}=-\frac{g+a_d(t)}{L}\sin\theta$$
where $$a_d(t)=A_0\sin(2\pi t/T_d)$$ is the time-varying acceleration of the pivot. Show that when the amplitude of the driving acceleration is sufficiently high $$A_0\gg g$$ the pendulum is stable in the inverted position i.e., if $$\theta(t=0)\approx180°$$.
Relevant Equations
$$\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2}=-\frac{g+a_d(t)}{L}\sin\theta$$
where $$a_d(t)=A_0\sin(2\pi t/T_d)$$ is the time-varying acceleration of the pivot.
I understand that when $$A_0 \gg g$$, the g term in the equation of motion can be dropped. The equation of motion then becomes
$$\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2}=-\frac{a_d(t)}{L}\sin\theta$$

But how can I show that the pendulum is stable for such case? I am totally clueless.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there any condition on ##T_d##? Say ##T_d=\infty## the inverted pendulum is unstable.
 
looks like an ill - understood Kapitza's pendulum
 
mitochan said:
Is there any condition on ##T_d##? Say ##T_d=\infty## the inverted pendulum is unstable.
Hi, mitochan! There were no specified conditions for ##T_d## given in the problem.
 
wrobel said:
looks like an ill - understood Kapitza's pendulum
It is quite consistent with the mechanics of Kapitza's pendulum. I presume that something is wrong in the problem, right?
 
I do not know.

Anyway stability of the Kapitza pendulum is proved by means of KAM theory. All this field is far beyond undergraduate courses.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.

Similar threads

Back
Top