How can the trig identity |cos(z)|^2 = cos^2x + sinh^2y be proven?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the trig identity |cos(z)|^2 = cos^2(x) + sinh^2(y), where z = x + iy. The user initially expands |cos(z)|^2 to |cos(x)cosh(y) - i(sin(x)sinh(y))|^2, resulting in cos^2(x)cosh^2(y) + sin^2(x)sinh^2(y). The user encounters difficulty in equating this expression to the desired identity and suspects a potential error in the provided answer. Further exploration suggests substituting sin^2(x) with 1 - cos^2(x) may lead to the correct proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their representation (z = x + iy).
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities and hyperbolic functions.
  • Knowledge of the properties of cosine and sine functions.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills for simplifying expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the relationship between trigonometric and hyperbolic functions.
  • Learn about the proof techniques for complex identities in mathematics.
  • Explore the implications of substituting trigonometric identities in proofs.
  • Review examples of similar complex function proofs for better understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in complex analysis or trigonometric identities will benefit from this discussion.

mattmns
Messages
1,121
Reaction score
5
I am asked to prove the following: (Note: z = x + iy)

|cos(z)|2 = cos2x + sinh2y
---------------

So I started the following way:

|cos(z)|2 = |cos(x+iy)|2
= |cos(x)cosh(y) - i(sin(x)sinh(y))|2
= cos2(x)cosh2(y) + sin2(x)sinh2(y) [after having square root squared removed]

once I got here I was stuck. I am just not seeing how we can get this to equal cos2x + sinh2y

Is there some silly trig identity I don't know? Or did I make a mistake? Any ideas?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're right and the given answer is wrong. Try plugging in a few values of z to check.
 
I thought about it maybe being wrong too, never thought of pluging in values though, duh! :smile:

Take z = \pi / 2 and clearly we get something different on both sides. Guess I will talk to my professor about it since he wrote the homework himself. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Actually, my z = pi/2 is not a counterexample (since x = pi/2 and y = 0, we get 0 on both sides).

For the actual proof, I just need to continue where I left off, but change sin2 to 1-cos2, which supposedly gets what we want (I have yet to work it out).
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K