How Can We Determine if Someone is Farsighted?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Examined
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lenses
AI Thread Summary
Farsightedness is characterized by the inability to focus on nearby objects, which is linked to the minimum focal length of the eye's lens not being small enough. The correct answer to the homework question is A, indicating that the lens cannot achieve a sufficiently small focal length. The professor's explanation was initially misunderstood, as the relationship between object distance and focal length was confused. When the object distance decreases, the focal length must also decrease to maintain clarity. The discussion clarified the reasoning behind the correct answer, resolving the initial confusion.
Examined
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Which of the following is a characteristic of a farsighted person (nearby objects appear blurry)?
a)the minimum focal length they can get for the lens of their eye is not small enough.
b) the maximum focal length they can get for the lens of their eye is not large enough
c) their lens of their eye is not symmetrical

Homework Equations


1/f = 1/p + 1/q

f = 1/(1/p + 1/q)

p = 1/(1/f-1/q)

f is focal length, p is object distance, q is image distance

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is B. I agree, but I don't understand my professor's explanation.

The explanation for B being correct:
"with q fixed, then to make p small f --> large. If can't get f --> large then can't get p --> small."

My reasoning - I found that when P increases, F must increase, which is the opposite of the explanation. If when P decreases F decreases, and if when P is small the objects are blurry, F must be too small.

If someone can confirm or deny the validity of my reasoning and explain the explanation given by my professor it would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The correct answer is A.

Your professor made a mistake, maybe?
 
dauto said:
The correct answer is A.

Your professor made a mistake, maybe?

He certainly may be wrong, though it is unlikely. Where is the flaw in my reasoning?
 
You said it yourself. You got the opposite effect as the one used in the explanation. Small p requires small f. If it's blurry it's because they couldn't produce such a small f because "the minimum focal length they can get for the lens of their eye is not small enough". Notice how I concluded the logical statement with the quoted answer from item A. A is the correct answer.
 
dauto said:
You said it yourself. You got the opposite effect as the one used in the explanation. Small p requires small f. If it's blurry it's because they couldn't produce such a small f because "the minimum focal length they can get for the lens of their eye is not small enough". Notice how I concluded the logical statement with the quoted answer from item A. A is the correct answer.

Ah, you are right. I confused myself. It's clear now. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top