How can we prove the work done by gas expansion in any deformable container?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the work done by gas expansion in deformable containers, specifically how the formula W=∫p.dV applies beyond simple systems like syringes. The key point is establishing that dV can be expressed as S.h, where S is the surface area and h is a small displacement normal to the surface. The conversation delves into the mathematical complexities involved in generalizing this concept to any deformable container. It suggests that a suitable diffeomorphism can help define the normal to the surface, allowing for the formulation of dW in terms of pressure and volume changes. Overall, the challenge lies in navigating the mathematical intricacies to prove the formula's applicability in more complex scenarios.
raopeng
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
In my textbook W=∫p.dV is only proved for a syringe with a piston. This is quite easily done but the book never explains how it extrapolates to the general situation for a gas expanding in any deformable container. It seems the point is to prove dV= S.h where S is the surface area of a given container and h is a small displacement alone the direction of the normal to the surface. I tried in this line of thought but things soon get really mathematical and confusing. How can prove this formula in any deformable containers? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well the mathematical idea is that since for a (n-1) sub-manifold a R^n-1 can be introduced, the orthogonal complement to the hyperplane R^n-1 becomes after a suitable diffeomorphism the normal to the surface in the space, Hence it is possible to write dV=S.h for any n-volume. Then dW=F.h=p.S.h=p.dV...
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

Use internal pressure to compute work done by an expanding gas?
Replies
15
Views
3K
Work done on container receiving gas from high pressure container
Replies
1
Views
1K
Simple doubt in work done by gas
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Sign convention on work done to a closed system containing gas
Replies
5
Views
3K
Work done by compressing a container of gas
Replies
11
Views
3K
Can Someone Explain the Calculation of Work Done by Gas Expansion?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Constant pressure or isobaric expansion of gas
Replies
14
Views
6K
Work done by ideal gas processes
Replies
2
Views
2K
I How Is Entropy Calculated in an Irreversible Gas Expansion?
Replies
33
Views
3K
How Does Joule Thomson Expansion Affect Gas Temperature?
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top