How can we solve for (x+y)^4 = x^4+y^4 without using x=-y as a solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JasonRox
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation (x+y)^4 = x^4 + y^4 holds true when either x or y equals zero, but the discussion seeks other potential solutions. Participants explored the expansion of the left-hand side and noted that after canceling common terms with the right-hand side, they were left with a quadratic equation that lacks real solutions. The analysis confirmed that the only valid solution is x = y = 0, dismissing x = -y as a viable option. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the limitations of finding non-zero solutions for the equation.
JasonRox
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
2,381
Reaction score
4
(x+y)^4=x^4+y^4

We know this is true if x and/or y = 0, but what other possibilities are there?

I solved for (x+y)^2=x^2+y^2, which has x=-y as a possibility.

The solution isn't necessary, a couple tips should lead me in the right direction.

I broke it down in several ways, but a hint for something to look for would be great. I happen to always be stuck with something along the line like...

STUFF+x^2y^2

I can get the stuff area to equal to zero, but because the are both odd or even numbers that are equal I am always stuff with the odd one at the end.

I lost my paper that shows what STUFF is (stupid I know), but I'll work out a second time and maybe then I'll find a solution.

Any advice would be great.

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Expand the LHS, and cancel off the common terms with the RHS. You have 3 remaining terms =0. Factoring out xy (stipulating that they be not zero) from these gives you a quadratic, which has no real solutions, and this, you'll figure when you get to it...
 
I solved for (x+y)^2=x^2+y^2, which has x=-y as a possibility.

Are u sure?
Substitute x=-y on the LHS and then in the RHS .. are they equal?
Simple analysis ,
(x+y)^2 = x^2+2xy+y^2
if (x+y)^2=x^2+y^2
implies
x^2+2xy+y^2 = x^2+y^2
implies
2xy = 0
implies
x or y or both = 0

A similar analysis has been outlined by Gokul in his last post for the power 4 case.

-- AI
 
(x+y)4= x4+ 4x3y+6x2y2+4xy3+ y4.

Setting that equal to x4+ y4, we can cancel the x4 and y4 terms on both sides leaving

4x3y+ 6x2y2+ 4xy3= 0 or
2xy(2x2+ 3xy+ 2y2)= 0

Clearly x= y= 0 works. It should be evident that 2x2+ 3xy+ 2y2= 0 has no real solutions so x= y= 0 is again the only solution.
 
Nevermind about x=-y. I was looking at the wrong solution.
 
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top