How Can You Derive the Lorentz Equations from Basic Assumptions?

stevmg
Messages
696
Reaction score
3
In certain physics textbooks, one starts with the assumption (in a one linear and one time dimension) that

1) x2 - c2t2 = x'2 - c2t'2

I don't want to go into that. Let us start from there.

Now, if you assume that

2) x = vt, then

3) x' = 0 always because the origin is moving at v along the x-axis so that x' is always zero.

Using those three bits of information one can derive the Lorentz equations:

x' = \gamma(x - vt)
t' = \gamma(t - xv/c2)

where \gamma = SQRT[1 - v2/c2] (I can't get the square root to come out in LATEX)

I have tried, tried, tried to do that but I cannot.

Anyone can help?

If I substitute the Lorentz equations back into the above three bits of information, it will work out but that's backwards. I want to do it forwards.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
c^2\text{d}\tau^2=c^2\text{d}t^2-\text{d}x^2

This is a usual way to express the minowski metric, or SR metric. \tau is proper time, measured by an observer at rest relative to the frame being measured.

From here:

\left(\frac{\text{d}\tau}{\text{d}t}\right)^2=1-\frac{1}{c^2}\left(\frac{\text{d}x}{\text{d}t}\right)^2

We use the symbol v for \frac{\text{d}x}{\text{d}t}.

\left(\frac{\text{d}\tau}{\text{d}t}\right)^2=1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}

\frac{\text{d}\tau}{\text{d}t}=\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}

In the case of constant velocity, the right hand side is a constant. We can integrate wrt. t, letting \tau=t=0 initially and obtain

\tau=t\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}

or the more familiar

t=\frac{\tau}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}
 
Last edited:
Perfect!

Actually, that makes it clearer than the text I was reading from.

Thanks,

Steve G
Melbourne, FL
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top