How Can You Design a Ramp for Consistent Ball Rolling?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Crystal Faye
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ramp
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around designing a ramp that allows a ball to roll from point A to point B within a specified time frame. The participants are exploring the physics of rolling motion, including the effects of incline angles and material choices for both the ramp and the ball.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the choice of materials for the ramp and ball, considering factors like slipping and uniformity. There are questions about how to achieve the required timing for the ball's travel and whether to account for acceleration before the measured distance. Some participants are exploring the implications of the angle of the ramp and its relation to the rolling motion.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with various suggestions and ideas being shared. Some participants have proposed mechanical solutions for timing the ball's travel, while others are still working on calculations related to acceleration and angle. There is a collaborative atmosphere, with participants offering to help each other with calculations and design considerations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a school assignment that requires precise timing for the ball's travel. There is uncertainty about the accuracy of timing methods and the specific requirements set by the teacher. The discussion also touches on the participants' varying levels of experience in physics.

  • #31
In your calculation for the acceleration of the ball down the ramp your end velocity is a sort of average velocity since the ball are accelerating down the ramp. The initial velocity is assumed to be zero, but then in your calculation you've got

v_i = \frac{?}{.9s}

?

Another way of calculating the acceleration of the ball down the ramp is via the known distance that the ball will travel and the given time. Also assume that the ball will start out of rest.

Are you contemplating in using a ping-pong ball? The mass is awfully small. So I assume that the ball is hollow. The formula I gave you is for a solid, not hollow ball. So you need to consider another type of ball. I feel that the chances of you current ball slipping is great. Rather go for a hard rubber type ball - a super ball with more mass.

Please write with a very soft pencil, maybe 2B. It is difficult to see your work as it is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
We are using a super ball. It is possible that we took the measurement wrong, or that I wrote down the wrong number. I will double check at school today.

For initial velocity, I wrote 0 over .9 seconds to prove why it was zero. Is my acceleration wrong?

Is my X value really wrong?
 
  • #33
As I say. Please bear with me I am a Physicist. Let's try and get things right.

Rather do the acceleration calculation as follows. We assume that the given information is correct for the 1 meter distance, that is that the conditions must be such that the ball need to cover the distance in 1.8 s. The acceleration can then be calculated with

s = 0.5at^2

The assumtion that the ball need to cover 0.5 meter in half the time is a bit cock-eyed. Some one's physics is a bit off, unless I misunderstand the problem. So calculate the acceleration with the info for the 1 meter distance and then recalculate the time for the half meter distance since it seems that you are going to measure the time over half a meter.

The acceleration should come out a bit different from your 0.7 m/s^2.

Your mass is definitely wrong for a four centimeter super ball. I would estimate that it should be in the order of 100 - 200 grams.

Would'nt it be easier to use a longer ramp with 2 lines on it half a meter apart? Maybe test the concept with a piece of scrap to weigh the pros and cons. The starting position could then be a buffer nailed to the ramp. This way the ball always start at exactly the same point.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
You were correct. The mass of the ball was actually 50.6 grams. I am not sure how we could have made such a simple mistake. Thanks for pointing that out.

So, to calculate acceleration.. Should I merely just insert 1 meter where it was previously .5 meters and 1.8 seconds where I had put .9 seconds?

Or do I use the new equation that you had given me? Can you tell me more about the new equation.
 
  • #35
The constant acceleration equation

s=ut+\frac{1}{2}at^2

should be in your handbook. Use it and the distance 1.0 meter and time of 1.8 s to cover this distance. Then use this equation again with the calculated acceleration and the "new" distance of 0.50 meters to calculate the time to cover for this "new" distance.

I am sure your teacher knows his Physics very well. But anyone makes mistakes from time to time and I think this might be one of them.

Just follow my lead and all will become clear. I am not that good at explaining things, or do not have the patience for it.
 
  • #36
Thanks. I looked in my book for the meaning of the equation. The closest that I have came is centripical accerlation. It does not look like the same thing. I can not figure out what the "u" in the equation means.

\
 
  • #37
s is the distance the object travels (in a straight line) [we want the ball to travel 1 meter down the ramp in this case] during the time t [1.8 seconds is the time it must take the ball to travel this distance of 1 meter down the ramp].

u is the object's speed when the timing is started (t = 0 seconds)
[in this case the ball is started out of rest so u = 0 m/s].

and a is the constant acceleration of the ball down the ramp that we can calculate with the given information.

The density of the ball seems to be about 980\ kg/m^3 which means it should float in water with a little bit of head above the water. Please check that this is the case because I would have thought that it should be a bit heavier.
 
  • #38
Answers to some questions that might have bothered you:

http://www.Newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy00/phy00124.htm"

http://www.physics.uoguelph.ca/tutorials/torque/Q.torque.inertia.html"

http://www.physics.ucla.edu/demoweb/demomanual/mechanics/kinematics/acceleration_down_an_inclined_plane.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #39
I really want to thank you. Our ramp came out very well. We presented it today and I made a 98 percent on it. I know that a 98 percent is not perfect, but I am pleased.

We named ourselves "Team Andrevdh" haha.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
33
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
17K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K