How Can You Prove a^2 = 1 in a Ring Given ab + ba = 1 and a^3 = a?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PsychonautQQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Ring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that \( a^2 = 1 \) in a ring under the conditions \( ab + ba = 1 \) and \( a^3 = a \). Participants explore the implications of these equations within the context of ring theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods to manipulate the given equations, questioning the validity of multiplying by \( a^{-1} \) and the implications of the ring's properties. Some express confusion about the equivalence of derived equations and the assumptions needed to reach conclusions.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing different approaches and equations derived from the original conditions. Some have noted potential paths to simplify the problem, while others are still grappling with the implications of their manipulations.

Contextual Notes

There is an acknowledgment that the ring may not have multiplicative inverses, which affects the validity of certain manipulations. Participants are also considering the implications of assuming \( a^2 = 1 \) while exploring the relationships between the variables.

PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


A) If ab+ba = 1 and a^3 = a in a ring, show that a^2 = 1

Homework Equations


none

The Attempt at a Solution


Little confused. If we know that a^3 = a, can't we just multiply each on the right or left side by a^-1 to get a^2 = 1? Or could we only do that if the ring is said to be commutative?

edit: I realized that to show that a^2 = 1 in the way I mentioned above that a would have to be a division ring. Normal rings aren't guaranteed to have multiplicative inverses.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would start by multiplying the first equation by an a on the left, then do the same with an a on the right. Compare the resulting equations. Then there should only be one reasonable conclusion that satisfies ##a^3=a## as well.
 
So I get b + aba = a and aba + b = a, (considering a^2=1) is there something obvious that I'm missing here? The two equations are the same thing are they not?
 
Last edited:
## ab+ba = 1,## so left multiplying gives ## a^2 b + aba = a## and right multiplying gives ## aba+ba^2=a##. Moving ##aba## to the other side shows that ##a^2b = a-aba = ba^2##.
Similarly, you could right/left multiply ##a^2## to show that ## a^3b+a^2ba=a^2 = aba^2 + ba^3 ##. Substituting the fact that ## a^2b=ba^2 ## should allow you to cancel out some (edit) ##a^3##s.
 
Last edited:
PsychonautQQ said:
So I get b + aba = a and aba + b = a, (considering a^2=1) is there something obvious that I'm missing here? The two equations are the same thing are they not?
I would not assume what you are trying to show at this point.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PsychonautQQ
There aren't many many ways to use the two given equations. Let's start with ##ab+ba=1##. What can we do with this other than to insert the assumption ##a=a^3##? This gives us ##1=ab+ba=a^3b+ba^3##. How can we rewrite the right-hand side? Replacing ##a## with ##a^3## again doesn't look very promising, and replacing ##a^3## with ##a## just takes us back to where we started. So we're almost certainly going to have to use ##ab+ba=1## (possibly more than once) to rewrite the right-hand side.
 
Update:

I now have four (seven?) equations I'm moving around.

1) a = (a^2)*b + a*b*a
2) a = aba + b(a^2)
3) 1 = (a^3)b + b(a^3)
4) 1 = ab + ba

Hence...
5) ab + ba = (a^3)b + b(a^3)
6) aba + b(a^2) = (a^2)*b + a*b*a

I even multiplied 5 and 6 together to try to get something. Got messy.

Hmmm.
 
From 1 and 2 you have ##a^2b=ba^2##.
Multiplying 4 by ##a^2## gives either ## a^2 = a^3b+a^2ba ## or ## a^2 = aba^2+ba^3##.
Using the facts that ##a^3 = a## and ##a^2b=b^2a## you can reduce this down to something equivalent to ##a^2 = 1##.
 
I was able to solve it using RUber's suggestion, but I also found a way to solve it without ever multiplying an equation by anything. So one piece of advice is to resist the temptation to multiply things together.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PsychonautQQ
  • #10
Wow I got it. Thanks a ton for your help I appreciate it. Totally got it before Fredriks last comment :P. I'm studying this stuff independently because I'm a Math nerd and it's tough! It's fun though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K