How Can You Prove a Bijection from [0,1] to [a,b]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sandra1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
To prove a bijection from [0,1] to [a,b], an example function like f(x) = c(x - h) can be used, where constants c and h are determined to ensure f(0) = a and f(1) = b. The discussion highlights that functions of the form f(x) = mx + n are indeed bijections when appropriately defined. There is a suggestion to consider different cases based on the values of a and b, but it is emphasized that not all functions from [0,1] to [a,b] are bijections, particularly when considering continuity. The conversation underscores the importance of validating the assumption that all functions are bijections before proceeding with case analysis. Understanding the nature of the functions involved is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
sandra1
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I really don't understand the question for this problem, could you please help me out? Thanks so much

1.a,b are some real numbers. Give an example of a bijection from [0,1] to [a,b]
2. Prove that all functions from [0,1] to [a,b] are bijections

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I think the example function could be something like Sqrt(1-x) + Sqrt(x). That makes its domain be [0,1]. But I don't know how to make it end up with the value of [a,b]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try a function like this--f(x) = c(x - h)--with domain restricted to [0, 1]. You'll need to figure out what the constants c and h need to be so that f(0) = a and f(1) = b.
 
Hi, oh yes, your function works. All functions f(x) = mx + n are bijections. Thanks for your help.

About the second one, do you think I should break it into 3 cases. With a,b < 0; a,b > 0; and a <0 ^ b>0?
 
Before looking at your cases, you should first ask yourself whether it's true. "All functions" covers a lot of territory, including functions that are continuous as well as those that are discontinuous.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top