MHB How can you simplify exponents involving fractions and roots?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CSmith1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying exponents involving fractions and roots, specifically using the example of 32 raised to the power of 2/5. The calculations initially presented are critiqued for clarity and notation, emphasizing the importance of using proper formatting like LaTeX for better understanding. A simpler approach is suggested, noting that 32 can be expressed as 2^5, leading to the simplification of (2^5)^(2/5) to 2^2, which equals 4. The conversation highlights the strategy of applying roots before powers for easier calculations. Ultimately, the key takeaway is the importance of clarity in notation and the flexibility in the order of operations for simplification.
CSmith1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
is this correct?
1.) 32 2/5(32 1/5) ^2=(5 SQUARE ROOT 32)2

=5(SQUAREROOT 2X2X2X2X2)2
=(5 SQUARE ROOT )2

=5 SQUARE ROOT 2 X 5 SQUARE ROOT 2
=25 (2 SQUARE ROOT 2)
=50 SQUARE ROOT 2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
CSmith said:
is this correct?
1.) $32^{2/5}$$(32^{1/5}) ^2$=(5 SQUARE ROOT 32)2
$(\sqrt[5]{32})^2$

=5(SQUAREROOT 2X2X2X2X2)2
$= (\sqrt[5]{2 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 2})^2$

Notation aside you're correct up to here

=(5 SQUARE ROOT )2

=5 SQUARE ROOT 2 X 5 SQUARE ROOT 2
=25 (2 SQUARE ROOT 2)
=50 SQUARE ROOT 2

You've lost me here though. You have $(\sqrt[5]{2^5})^2$ which is the same as $((2^5)^{1/5})^2$ which cancels down to $2^2$

A simpler way IMO is to note that $32 = 2^5$ (as you did). That leaves you with $(2^5)^{2/5} = 2^{5 \cdot 2/5} = 2^2$Your notation is very tricky to follow. Please use Latex or "^" together with brackets next time to make it easer to follow.
 
I don't know how you were taught to approach these, but the short way to remember a fraction as an exponent is "power over root". The top number of the fraction is a power, so you should multiply the number together that many times. The bottom number is a root, so you need to find a number that multiplied together that many times gives you the original number. You can do it in either order, but you do one at a time. You have 32 to begin with so it's logical to take the root first because that will be a smaller number than 32. If you apply the power first then the result will be quite large and less easy to work with.

[math]32^{\frac{1}{5}}=2[/math] because $2 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 = 32$.

So now we've applied the root and got 2. Now we apply the power and get $2^2=4$ and we're done. Again you can choose the order in which you calculate this so take a second to consider both options and choose the one that has the easier numbers to work with.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top