How Can You Solve for x in Complex Elastic Collision Equations?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter luckis11
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving for the variable x in complex equations related to elastic collisions of unequal masses at an angle of impact α. Participants explore the mathematical intricacies of isolating x within a quartic equation, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a complex equation and asks if x can be isolated.
  • Another participant notes the difficulty of reading the equation due to the lack of LaTeX formatting and suggests it appears to be a quartic equation.
  • Several participants discuss methods for simplifying the equation, including isolating terms and squaring both sides to eliminate square roots.
  • A participant mentions that after isolating the square root, they encountered a large number of terms, leading to confusion about the solution.
  • Another participant points out that the presence of imaginary numbers in the solutions suggests potential issues with the original equation or assumptions made.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the relevance of complex solutions and whether they indicate a mistake in the formulation of the problem.
  • There is a suggestion to use computational tools like Mathematica to find solutions, but the relevance of these solutions is debated.
  • Participants express differing opinions on the classification of the problem's difficulty level, with some suggesting it is not as advanced as initially indicated.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of the solutions, particularly regarding the implications of complex numbers. There is also disagreement on the classification of the problem's difficulty level, with some asserting it is more straightforward than initially presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the equation and the potential for confusion due to the number of terms generated during manipulation. There are unresolved questions regarding the definitions of variables and the assumptions underlying the problem.

luckis11
Messages
272
Reaction score
2
Poster has been reminded to use LaTeX to post math equations on PF.
(Tsinα)^2+(u+Tcosα)^2=((1+μ/m)((μu^2-μx^2-m((u-x)m/μ)^2)/(μ+μ^2/m))^0.5+Tsinα)^2+(Tcosα+(u-x)μ/m-x)^2

Can you isolate x? I.e. x=...
It's for elastic collision of unequal masses under angle of impact α.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You haven't used LaTeX so your equation is very difficult to read, but it looks like a rather messy quartic.

You've flagged this as A level, meaning that you have postgraduate knowledge of the topic. Is that correct?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Oh, wait, there is a square root in there somewhere... You make us work for it ;) But I would start to clean things up a bit by collecting all terms of x, then collect all terms not containing an 'x' and give it some other name. Then it is much easier to read.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
$$(Tsinα)^2+(u+Tcosα)^2=\left((1+μ/m)\left(\frac{μu^2-μx^2-m((u-x)m/μ)^2}{μ+μ^2/m}\right)^{0.5}+Tsinα\right)^2+(Tcosα+(u-x)μ/m-x)^2$$
Like this?

Combine random constants:
$$a=\left(b\left(f+gx^2+hx\right)^{0.5}+c\right)^2+(d+ex)^2$$
You can expand the first square, then isolate the square root, square the whole equation, and you get a quartic equation, which has a closed solution but it's really awkward.
 
I isolated the square root so got rid of it by squaring both sides of the equation, but I got (28 factors)^2=27+26+...+1 factors. So it's helpless.
 
I don't think you mean factors (or helpless). I think you mean terms.

Anyway, " (28 factors)^2=27+26+...+1 factors " doesn't have an x in it, so we don't know where you are. It does not look like you followed mfb's path.
 
Continuing with @mfb's equation. If I haven't made a mistake:

$$
\left[ \left(\sqrt{a - (d+ex)^2} - c\right)/b \right]^2 = f + gx^2 + hx
$$

then

$$
\left(a - (d+ex)^2 + c^2 - 2c \sqrt{ a - (d+ex)^2}\right)/b^2 = f + gx^2 + hx
$$

Expanding the terms in the square root will leave a ##\sqrt{x}## term. So it is not a quartic... I wouldn't know how to solve this.
 
  • #10
Bring everything except the square root onto the right hand side, then square. You will hAve a quartic.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arjan82
  • #11
Oh, whoops, you are right :). I wasn't paying attention. I thought my second equation already had powers of four in x. (that happens when you are doing things simultaneously...)
 
  • #12
luckis11 said:
(Tsinα)^2+(u+Tcosα)^2=((1+μ/m)((μu^2-μx^2-m((u-x)m/μ)^2)/(μ+μ^2/m))^0.5+Tsinα)^2+(Tcosα+(u-x)μ/m-x)^2

Can you isolate x? I.e. x=...
It's for elastic collision of unequal masses under angle of impact α.

In case you simply want an expresson to work with, you can solve for x in Mathematica easily:

[CODE title="Mathematica"]In[15]:= mySol[a_, d_, e_, c_, b_, f_, g_, h_] =
x /. Solve[(a - (d + e x)^2 + c^2 -
2 c Sqrt[a - (d + e x)^2])/(b^2) == f + g x^2 + h x, x];
mySol[1, 2, 3 + I, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] // N

Out[16]= {-0.61495 - 0.545281 I, -0.559976 + 0.594679 I, -0.577998 +
0.710359 I, -0.56296 - 0.727542 I}[/CODE]
 
  • #13
I do not know this, what am I supposed to do with
{-0.61495 - 0.545281 I, -0.559976 + 0.594679 I, -0.577998 +
0.710359 I, -0.56296 - 0.727542 I}
 
  • #14
I don't think that explicit solution is too relevant since it seems that for the chosen values of a to h all solutions have an imaginary part.

But if you want a solution then you have to do some of the work yourself. Start with the equation in post #9 and apply the hint in post #10. Then you'll have your quartic and can solve it using the equation in the wiki link in post #4.
 
  • #15
Ι told you I "solved" it but it has >27+26+...+1 terms. I don't see how imaginary numbers can help, can they? However, I do not have the equation of the op any more, I deleted it. I hope it's the same as the one I have now.
 
  • #16
Ibix said:
You've flagged this as A level, meaning that you have postgraduate knowledge of the topic. Is that correct?
I moved the thread from the calculus forum to general math and reclassified it as level B as it's just a complicated algebra problem.
 
  • #17
The answer with imaginary numbers aheight mentioned is top level my friend.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #18
luckis11 said:
The answer with imaginary numbers aheight mentioned is top level my friend.
The fact that a solution you found involves complex numbers does not make this question a "top level" (i.e., A = post grad) type of problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, Vanadium 50 and jim mcnamara
  • #19
So what's the solution with complex numbers.
 
  • #20
The same as it was in messages 12, 13, 15, 17 and 18.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #21
luckis11 said:
So what's the solution with complex numbers.
It's impossible to say since you didn't define what any of the quantities are. But if you were expecting a real root, a complex result usually means the equation you started with is wrong.
 
  • #22
luckis11 said:
(Tsinα)^2+(u+Tcosα)^2=((1+μ/m)((μu^2-μx^2-m((u-x)m/μ)^2)/(μ+μ^2/m))^0.5+Tsinα)^2+(Tcosα+(u-x)μ/m-x)^2

Can you isolate x? I.e. x=...
It's for elastic collision of unequal masses under angle of impact α.
Yes.
 
  • #23
Don't bother, I solved it. Not exactly that equation, but a similar I have now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K