MHB How can you solve the eight-digit challenge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter soroban
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge
soroban
Messages
191
Reaction score
0

Place the digits 1 through 8 in the boxes
so that no two consecutive digits are adjacent
(not vertically, horizontally or diagonally).
. . \begin{array}{cccccccccc}&& * & - & * & - & * \\ && | && | && | \\ * &-& * &-& * &-& * &-& * \\ | && | && | && | && | \\ * &-& * &-& * &-& * &-& * \\ && | && | && | \\ && * & - & * & - & * \end{array}
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The two central boxes are adjacent to the most other boxes, so it makes sense to put 1 and 8 in them to maximize our options (since 0 and 9 are not valid digits). By horizontal symmetry, it doesn't really matter what order we put them in. So we start with:​

Code:
  ? ?
? 1 8 ?
  ? ?

Here we automatically deduce that 7 must go in the leftmost box and 2 in the rightmost box, otherwise there would be two adjacent consecutive numbers. Hence:

Code:
  ? ?
7 1 8 2
  ? ?

Hence we have 3, 4, 5, and 6 left to place. We see that 6 must be in one of two boxes on the right, and 3 must be in one of the boxes on the left. Furthermore, 4 and 5 cannot be put adjacent to one another. This forces the following configuration (up to symmetry):

Code:
  3 5
7 1 8 2
  4 6

And the puzzle is solved.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top