How Can You Symbolically Solve for x in Mathematical Functions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ryanfjdskljafl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symbols
Ryanfjdskljafl
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, first time on the forum, so please feel free to give me unsolicited advice on if there's a better place to post this:

if i have a function f(x), is there a way to symbolize 'solve for x'.

for example, if f(x) == 3x^2, and I'm setting f(x) = 3, I want to be able to symbolically do something like x = f_inverse(3), so that we solve for x.
3x^2 = 3, x = 1.

is there a method to represent this symbolically like what I tried doing with f_inverse above?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I moved your thread out of the Homework section as it seemed a better fit in the General Math section.
Ryanfjdskljafl said:
if i have a function f(x), is there a way to symbolize 'solve for x'.

for example, if f(x) == 3x^2, and I'm setting f(x) = 3, I want to be able to symbolically do something like x = f_inverse(3), so that we solve for x.
3x^2 = 3, x = 1.

is there a method to represent this symbolically like what I tried doing with f_inverse above?
In general, no, there's not a way to solve for x in the equation y = f(x), unless the function is invertible. The condition for invertibility is that the function is one-to-one.

Your example function is not invertible. The function f(x) = 3x2 is not one-to-one, so doesn't have an inverse. If you solve the equation 3 = 3x2, you get two solutions: x = 1 or x = -1.

A function that is invertible is y = g(x) = ex. This is a one-to-one function, so there is an inverse that is itself a function; namely, x = g-1 (y) = ln(y).

Note to Fredrik, in case he steps in. I have used the notation sloppily. f above maps x to 3x2. I am aware of the difference between a function f and a function value f(x).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top