Medical How come science and technology blossomed with our species;

  • Thread starter Thread starter flashgordon2!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science Technology
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the evolution of human intelligence in relation to environmental changes, particularly the transition from jungle to savannah. It posits that while humans are often seen as uniquely intelligent, all life exhibits forms of intelligence, as evidenced by various species utilizing tools and technologies. The key argument is that as primate ancestors moved to less concentration-dependent environments, their cognitive abilities were liberated, allowing for the development of imagination and abstract thought over millions of years. This shift facilitated brain reorganization, leading to advanced skills and adaptability. The conversation also touches on the idea that intelligence is not solely a qualitative difference but rather a response to environmental pressures that encouraged learning and skill acquisition, making humans highly adaptable across different habitats.
flashgordon2!
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Since our species is the only one that science and technology has really blossomed to such a degree, I'd think everybody knows which species I'm talking about. And, that blossoming is part of the clue that I'm seeing. People have tried to suggest human thinking is qualitativelly different; maybe it is, but the boundaries have proven pretty elusive so far, so I'm going to say that all life is intelligence; it took intelligence to create Gaia. There are many animals that use technologies from sea otters, to birds building their nests; spiders make webs; ancient bacteria built domes(cities of bacteria). Primates have used technologies for awhile now, but they havn't blossomed into civilization and mathematics quite the way we have. Why?

The clue that I feel is pretty important comes from my years of hiking; I've always noticed how all the other animals never loose concentration on the very present moment; if they do, they die. In jungles, this concentration requirement is without dought, but what about elsewhere? Yes, other areas are less concentratiion dependent; basically, the form of the animal is important which has been pointed out time and time again - the opposable thumb; the upright walking style - even overlapping vision.

What I'm saying is when the jungle turned into savanah's, the requirement of concentration on the very moment went way down compared to before for our species primate ancestors. This phenomenon happened many times to be sure before; but, before, the right form of animal to breed in the jungles(growing up in the trees improved our dependence on the eye and vision for our imagination); but, once the right form of life was freed of having to be in total concentration of the present moment, it's imagination was freed to think about other things.

Now, that doesn't mean we were ready for abstract thought then; it took millions of years for the brain to reorganize itself once freed; but, that reorganization was a responce to being freed to think about other things; this also doens't mean our primate ancestors didn't have to concentrate from time to time, but quantitativelly, our minds were freed when the jungle receded, and then we went through a certain time period of change in the brain(and body).
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I remember reading an article at physorg about how genetic evidence indicates the brain changed around 6K years ago; in other words, it isn't necessarilly that something qualitative is different from the rest of life, but that given the environement to release and explore in different ways, the brain will; i mean, were homo sapiens not intelligent pre-6k years ago? Of course not! They were intelligent when drawing in those caves, cooking with fire hundreds of thousands of years ago, making stone tools millions of years ago, finding food and dealing with all manner of enemies in rain forests even more millions of years ago and the same with all the rest of life.
 
Do other animals that live in open spaces demonstrate any particular advantage in intelligence?

My own pet theory is that changing environment happened to push us through a series of evolutionary hoops: We have adaptations for jungle(hands) savanah (legs) and water (nose and skin)

Rather than being especially good at anyone thing, we became highly adaptible.

Our skill set also had to be adaptable which was solved through the ability to learn skills rather than simply inherit them.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top