How could I make an exponential function which has a limit of around 1.53?

mpatryluk
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
I'm modelling a variable output Y which has a value of 1 at x=0.

I've noticed that in the system I'm modelling, as x increases, y increases at an exponentially decreasing rate, up until a limit of around 1.53. I view this as changes in x causing the Y value to increase by a max of 53%.

The only problem is I've been working at it but I don't know where to begin in modelling a function with such a limit.

Can anyone think of a solution?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You could use something like y = 1.53 - 0.53/(a*x+1), where a >= 0. I'm assuming x >= 0 as well here.

Adjust a to determine how quickly it approaches 1.53, for example determine the x at which y is say 1.35 (2/3rds), in which case a = 2/x.
 
  • Like
Likes mpatryluk
Lord Crc said:
You could use something like y = 1.53 - 0.53/(a*x+1), where a >= 0. I'm assuming x >= 0 as well here.

Adjust a to determine how quickly it approaches 1.53, for example determine the x at which y is say 1.35 (2/3rds), in which case a = 2/x.

Good solution, Thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top