How could one theoretically predict a material's permittivity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter VortexLattice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Permittivity
VortexLattice
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
I know experimentally, the permittivity of a material is ##\vec D = \epsilon \vec E##, and you can also relate the Polarization to it. So it's basically a response of the material to an applied E field.

But that seems like it would be a fairly complex thing to figure out theoretically. I guess one way would be to, for a given E field applied to a unit cell of the material, see how each atom gets polarized. But that seems like it would be incredibly complicated for unit cells with several atoms and a basis, and each atom having multiple electrons.

So I'm wondering how you could figure out the permittivity of a general crystal, like if you were told its interatomic distances, lattice constants, band structure, etc. Is there a better way than what I described above?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Permittivity can be calculated routinely with programs to calculate band structure. The basic approach is described in the article by Adler:

http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v126/i2/p413_1
 
DrDu said:
Permittivity can be calculated routinely with programs to calculate band structure. The basic approach is described in the article by Adler:

http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v126/i2/p413_1

Hi, thank you very much for the reply! However, after a quick glance at this I don't see how to get the permittivity assuming you already know the band structure... I'm sorry if I'm misunderstanding this, but is this what you meant?
 
Basically you use linear response (i.e. perturbation theory) to calculate the change in charge density due to an applied field. This requires you to know the band structure and Bloch states of the material being studied.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top