How Could Quantum Foam Shape Our Understanding of the Cosmos?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steve1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
Steve1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I been visiting the physicsforums for quit a while now. I am very interested in the publications of martin Bojowald and in specific by Renate Loll publications.

What can her work mean for Cosmology in the future, what will the Quantum foam landscape that she working on tell us about nature, an the nature of BB singularity ?.. Can someone help me to visualise that a little !.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Steve, I like the work of Loll and Ambjorn too.
the most recent update on what they are doing, that is available online, was given by Ambjorn at the June 2007 Loops conference.

She gave an invited talk at the GRG 18 conference in Sydney in July, so maybe they are taking turns and it was Ambjorn's turn in June. they have been collaborating since around 1998, if I remember correctly.

If you are interested in their approach you should probably listen to Ambjorn's talk.
==============

one thing that you will find out is that when the application is to COSMOLOGY then Bojowald and LQC have a big advantage because they can calculate numbers.

they can use both analytical tools AND numerical simulation

more new researchers have swarmed into LQC. there is more to do. many cases to study. things to calculate, in the traditional fashion of physicists.

also LQC has been consistently predicting a prior contracting phase, which is very interesting

it also has a brief phase of exponentially accelerating expansion that happens naturally without the need to put in an inflaton field----so it offers the chance of developing an alternative to conventional inflation scenarios
(alternative ways to resolve the horizon problem, flatness, structure formation...)
============

I agree that Loll's approach is extremely interesting and I urge you to listen to Ambjorn's talk, to get up to date on latest news about it.
But just in terms of applications to cosmology, there is currently much more activity in LQC
===============

Loops 07 program
http://www.matmor.unam.mx/eventos/loops07/program.html

plenary (invited) talks page (Ambjorn, Bojowald, Ashtekar...here)
http://www.matmor.unam.mx/eventos/loops07/plen_abs.html

contributed talks page
http://www.matmor.unam.mx/eventos/loops07/cont_abs.html

There is a chance that the approach being developed by a postdoc in Loll's group at Utrecht, named Dan ORITI, may prove to be a framework in which Causal Dynamical Triangulations can be calculated analytically. Oriti gave a plenary talk at Loops '07 and mentioned this possibility.

I have to go. back later. this is interesting to think about----implications of QG in cosmology. glad you brought it up
 
Last edited:
I think it wise to reserve judgement for now. Bojowald's work is very exciting, but speculative - as is Loll's. I would like to see some observational evidence. Interestingly enough, it may emerge from a computer [a Hardy thing]. The universe appears to obey principles of quantum information processing. I find that fascinating.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top