How cyclic coordinates affect the dimension of the cotangent manifold

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of cyclic coordinates on the dimension of the cotangent manifold in Hamiltonian dynamics. Participants explore the implications of constants of motion and the dimensionality of phase space, particularly in the context of a central force Hamiltonian.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references their professor's notes, stating that a constant of motion reduces the dimension of phase space by two dimensions in Hamiltonian dynamics, contrasting with Lagrangian dynamics where it reduces by one.
  • The same participant questions the interpretation of the professor's statement regarding the reduction of dimensions, specifically whether the reduction is from 5 to 4 due to specifying a numerical value for H or if it is due to the presence of a cyclic coordinate reducing dimensions from 6 to 4.
  • Another participant suggests checking a specific corollary from V.I. Arnold's work, which indicates that the phase space dimension is reduced by 2 times the number of cyclic coordinates in the Hamiltonian.
  • A later reply expresses gratitude and indicates a potential confusion regarding terminology related to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the interpretation of the reduction in dimension and whether it applies to the presence of cyclic coordinates or the specification of constants. There is no clear consensus on the implications of the professor's statements.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific definitions and theorems that may influence their understanding, but these are not fully resolved within the discussion. The terms used may have varying interpretations among participants.

mjordan2nd
Messages
173
Reaction score
1
Our professor's notes say that "In general, in Hamiltonian dynamics a constant of motion will reduce the dimension of the phase space by two dimensions, not just one as it does in Lagrangian dynamics." To demonstrate this, he uses the central force Hamiltonian,

[tex]H=\frac{P_r^2}{2m}+\frac{p_{\theta}^2}{2mr^2}+ \frac{p_{\phi}}{2mr^2 sin^2 \theta} + V(r).[/tex]

Since by Hamilton's equation [itex]\dot{p_{\phi}}=0[/itex] this is a constant of the motion. So specifying $p_{\phi}=\mu$ gives us a 5 dimensional manifold. The notes go on to state that, "Furthermore, on each invariant submanifold the Hamiltonian can be written

[tex]H=\frac{P_r^2}{2m}+\frac{p_{\theta}^2}{2mr^2}+ \frac{\mu}{2mr^2 sin^2 \theta} + V(r),[/tex]

which is a Hamiltonian involving only two freedoms [itex]r[/itex] and [itex]\theta[/itex]. Therefore the motion actually occurs on a 4-dimensional submanifold of the 5-dimensional submanifold of [itex]T^*Q[/itex] . . ." However, to me it looks like we still have five degrees of freedom: [itex]p_{\theta}, p_r, r, \theta,[/itex] and [itex]\phi[/itex]. So I'm not sure what he means when he says that the presence of a constant of motion reduces the dimension of the cotangent manifold by 2. Is he saying that if w specify a numerical value for H then the dimension is reduced from 5 to 4, or does just the presence of a cyclic coordinate reduce the dimension from 6 to 4?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
but isn't you Φ fixed?
 
Check out corollary 2, page 67 from V.I. Arnold's <Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics>. The phase space dimension is indeed reduced by 2xn, n=nr. of cyclic coordinates for the Hamiltonian.
 
Thank you. I think I'm just confusing terminology.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K