B How Difficult Will It Be to Remove Mars from the Planetary Protection Treaty?

B
Thread starter lifeonmercury
Start date Feb 9, 2017
Tags

Mars Planetary Protection

AI Thread Summary

The discussion centers on the challenges of removing Mars from the planetary protection treaty, which currently restricts certain activities to prevent contamination. There is a strong push for Mars colonization, yet the timeline and specific procedures for amending the treaty remain unclear. Participants note that the process may involve extensive research and data collection before any changes can be made. The consensus leans towards a "wait and see" approach as the scientific community gathers more information. Ultimately, the future of Mars colonization hinges on evolving research and international consensus regarding planetary protection.

Feb 9, 2017

lifeonmercury

In light of the strong desire to begin colonizing Mars in the near future, how easy will it be to remove Mars from the list of planets covered by the planetary protection treaty?

Last edited: Feb 9, 2017

Astronomy news on Phys.org

Feb 9, 2017

1oldman2

https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/ Doesn't appear to address the timeline or procedure. It appears to be a "wait and see" approach as research data matures.

Thread 'Does it make sense to build new radio telescopes?'

TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...

View full post »

Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

View full post »

Thread 'Can the signal WOW be explained by the maser effect?'

This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

View full post »