How do antifolates work re leukemia?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blueplusgreen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
Antifolates target rapidly dividing cells, particularly malignant and myeloid cells, by interfering with DNA and RNA synthesis during the S-phase of the cell cycle. This mechanism results in a greater toxic effect on cancerous cells compared to healthy cells, which can still access sufficient folate for their maturation and function. Healthy red blood cells have a longer lifespan, allowing them to utilize available folate effectively, even in the presence of antifolates. The discussion highlights the balance between folate availability and the rapid division of cancer cells, suggesting that the latter are more affected by the drug's action. Overall, antifolates selectively inhibit cancer cell growth while allowing healthy cells to maintain their function.
blueplusgreen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How do antifolates work re leukemia? I don't understand how healthy blood cells can get enough folate to mature when the same body's cancerous blast cells are being starved of it. Without folate, an otherwise healthy person gets anemic. How does this not apply to cancer patients? Can someone please explain?

The rapidity of cell division is listed as the reason but I would appreciate a little more explanation, an analogy, sumpin'!

Is it like giving the parent healthy blood cell and blast cell each a million bucks and each give their daughter cells each half and so on? So the faster the quicker blast cells procreate, the less the kids get? Can't the daughters go get their own supply? I don't understand! Please enlighten me!

Thanks in advance.
 
Biology news on Phys.org


Antifolates act mostly during DNA and RNA synthesis. They interfere during the
S-phase of the cell cycle. So, there is a greater toxic effect on rapidly
dividing cells, than on cells that are not busy dividing.

These dividing cells in humans are largely the malignant and myeloid cells, and
cells lining the gastrointestinal tract. Since these guys replicate their DNA
more frequently, the drugs like methotrexate largely slow the growth and
proliferation of these cancerous cells. And mucosal cells, too.

Because the effect is pervasive there are a lot of possible side-effects, too.
 


Thank you! But I'm dense. Can you clarify a little more? I was reading how Sidney Farber injected almost comatose kids with aminopterin and they got out of bed and played (for a few months). Is it just that there is so much folate in a body--even in the presence of an antifolate-- that the healthy red blood cells are able to grab enough of it to replicate fully and live about 120 days which is about how long Farber's remissions lasted? And the malignant cells (and mucosal) that keep dividing get weakened cause there isn't enough left over? Is there some equation that shows how much folate a healthy cell needs versus a malignant one?
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top