How Do Binary Dwarf/Neutron Stars get so close?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AdamAutism1998
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binary Stars
AI Thread Summary
Binary white dwarf stars can orbit closely due to their initial distance and slower orbits, which evolve over time, leading to faster orbits as they draw nearer. Their small and dense nature allows them to approach without merging immediately, though eventual merging into a neutron star or black hole is possible, likely accompanied by a supernova event. The discussion also highlights that close binaries can experience orbital decay through gravitational radiation and magnetized stellar winds, which contribute to the decrease in orbital period. However, the initial mechanism that brings these stars close enough for such decay remains less understood. Overall, the dynamics of binary star evolution and their potential outcomes are complex and still being explored.
AdamAutism1998
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
I am a little puzzled with how there is a White Dwarf Binary of Five Minutes. How do they get so close?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It's more than likely that the two stars originally were more distant from each other and orbiting more slowly.
Over a very long they have become closer, and so would need to orbit faster so that orbit is maintained.
Remember white dwarfs are very small and dense, so they could get very close together without actually colliding or merging.
Maybe this pair have settled into this small orbit and will stay that way for a long time, then again in the long run it's possible they will end up merging.
The result would probably be a neutron star, or possibly a black hole, and likely there would be a supernova event just before that.

If the original stars already are neutron stars, these are even smaller and denser then white dwarfs, and a binary pair could likely orbit even more rapidly before merging, (or exploding), could be in the region of seconds.
 
rootone said:
It's more than likely that the two stars originally were more distant from each other and orbiting more slowly.
Over a very long they have become closer, and so would need to orbit faster so that orbit is maintained.
Remember white dwarfs are very small and dense, so they could get very close together without actually colliding or merging.
Maybe this pair have settled into this small orbit and will stay that way for a long time, then again in the long run it's possible they will end up merging.
The result would probably be a neutron star, or possibly a black hole, and likely there would be a supernova event just before that.
Interesting. That's very good. Though I didn't think they would naturally get so close from just evolution.

I used to believe it was from a close binary in which one star is a white dwarf, and the other is a main-sequence. They orbit really close together, almost as a W Ursae Majoris variable. When the main sequence evolves, it envelops the white dwarf in it's expanding envelope, causing a friction dynamic to slow the white dwarf, while increasing it's mass. This leads for them to get closer and by the time the planetary nebula is ejected. In the end(if a type Ia Supernova doesn't occur) a close binary is left over. Like how Henize 2-428 probably was.

Very interesting.
 
In the case of close binary stars, we have learned orbital decay can be driven via emission of gravitational radiation. In the Hulse-Taylor study they were able to accurately acount for the decrease in orbital period of the system PSR B1913+16 over time via this mechanism. This does not, however, explain how the stars get close enough in the first place for gravitational radiation to become a driver for orbital decay. The principal mechanism for orbital decay of binary systems besides gravitational radiation is magnetized stellar winds which bleeds the system of angular momentum and energy causing the orbital period to slowly decline.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top