How Do Cepheid Variable Stars Illuminate Distance Calculations in Astronomy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Morpheus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Luminosity Star
AI Thread Summary
Cepheid variable stars, such as the one observed in the nearby galaxy M31, are crucial for distance calculations in astronomy due to their predictable luminosity based on their period of variation. For a Cepheid with a 40-day period, the luminosity is determined to be 20,900 solar luminosities. This value can be converted to ergs/sec using the solar luminosity constant of 3.85 x 10^33 ergs/sec, resulting in a specific luminosity in ergs/sec. The apparent brightness of the Cepheid is measured at 1.06 x 10^-12 ergs/sec/cm², allowing the distance to be calculated using the inverse square law of light. Understanding these relationships helps astronomers accurately gauge distances in the universe.
Morpheus
Here are a few more questions that I really need help on, thanks!




3. A Cepheid variable star is observed in the nearby galaxy M31. Its period of variation
is measured to be 40 days. Using the period - luminosity relation given in the table
below, what is the luminosity of the Cepheid in solar luminosities?
Period Luminosity
(days) (solar luminosities)
2.5 645
4.0 1120
6.3 2000
10.0 3550
15.8 6310
25.1 11500
40.0 20900
63.1 38000

4. For the Cepheid in M31, what is its luminosity in ergs/sec? (Recall that the solar
luminosity is 3.85 x 1033 ergs/sec.)


5. The Cepheid in M31 has its apparent brightness measured at 1.06 x 10-12 ergs/sec/cm2.
The inverse square law of light may be written as
b = L ÷ 4 pi r^2
Where b is the apparent brightness, L is the luminosity and r is the distance.
How far away is the Cepheid in centimeters? Convert your answer to parsecs by
knowing that one parsec contains 3.09 x 1018 centimeters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My biggest problem with these is that I'm totally lost. My professor assigns these problems, but our book and his notes don't show how to do them.
 
What? You mean your professor actually expects you to think for yourself? How evil of him.

Okay, that bit of sarcasm off my chest, in problem 3 you are given a table:
(days) (solar luminosities)
2.5 645
4.0 1120
6.3 2000
10.0 3550
15.8 6310
25.1 11500
40.0 20900
63.1 38000

and asked to determine the "luminosity" if "days"= 40. This is purely a test of how you can read a table? (emphasis mine.)

Once you know the number of "solar luminosities" you are told that each solar luminosity is 3.85 x 1033 ergs/sec. Okay, convert your solar lumnosities to ergs/sec. (Hint: if you knew each hamburger cost $1.50, how would you find the cost of 6 hamburgers?)

Finally you are given a formula: b = L ÷ 4 pi r^2
You know b (apparent brightness) is 1.06 x 10-12 ergs/sec/cm2.
You know L (luminosity) from problem 3 and you know (I hope!) that pi is approximately 3.1416. Plug them into the equation and solve for r.

By the way, do you recognize 4 pi r^2 as the formula for surface area of a sphere? In other words, that formula says that after the light has gone a distance r, the light, L, has spread out over the surface of that sphere giving the apparent brightness, b, for someone at one point on that sphere.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top