How do charges in a wall cancel out incoming electromagnetic waves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter k9b4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Wall
AI Thread Summary
Charges in a wall create an electromagnetic field that cancels incoming electromagnetic waves, resulting in zero intensity on the other side. While the concept of photons as bullets is mentioned, it is clarified that this analogy can lead to confusion, as photons do not behave like bullets. A wall can block different wavelengths of light, such as ultraviolet, while allowing visible light to pass through, despite the energy differences of their photons. The discussion emphasizes that the electromagnetic waves do not exist beyond the wall due to the cancellation effect of the wall's charges. Understanding the behavior of photons requires a deeper exploration of quantum mechanics concepts.
k9b4
Messages
109
Reaction score
2
I think that a wall does not actually stop light, I think the electromagnetic waves exist on the other side of the wall, but the charges in the wall provide their own electromagnetic field, such that charges on the other side of the wall feel both forces at the same time and 'cancel out'.

Is this correct?
 
Science news on Phys.org
I would think of photons as bullets.
If you have a strong enough bullet (enough energy), it will go through the wall. otherwise, not so much.
 
k9b4 said:
I think that a wall does not actually stop light, I think the electromagnetic waves exist on the other side of the wall, but the charges in the wall provide their own electromagnetic field, such that charges on the other side of the wall feel both forces at the same time and 'cancel out'.

Is this correct?

Not quite, but you have the right idea. The waves do not exist on the other side of the wall because the intensity of the electrical and magnetic fields there is zero - there is no wave, just as there are no water waves on the surface of a still pond. However, the intensity is zero for pretty much the reason that you give: the charges in the wall move around in response to the incoming wave in such a way that their electric fields always exactly cancel that of the incoming wave.
 
elegysix said:
I would think of photons as bullets.
If you have a strong enough bullet (enough energy), it will go through the wall. otherwise, not so much.

Photons do not behave even slightly like bullets, and thinking of light as a stream of photons is almost guaranteed to lead to confusion and misunderstanding. For example: A wall of glass will not stop a beam of visible light (that's why we use glass in windows, right?) but it will stop a beam of ultraviolet light - yet the photons of ultraviolet light have more energy than the photons of visible light.

(So that's what a photon is not. More likely, you want to know what a photon is... Try searching the quantum mechanics forum here with keywords like "photon particle", "photon bullet", "photon grain" and you'll find some posts about that).
 
Nugatory said:
Not quite, but you have the right idea. The waves do not exist on the other side of the wall because the intensity of the electrical and magnetic fields there is zero - there is no wave, just as there are no water waves on the surface of a still pond. However, the intensity is zero for pretty much the reason that you give: the charges in the wall move around in response to the incoming wave in such a way that their electric fields always exactly cancel that of the incoming wave.
Cool, thanks for explaining.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top