How Do Configurational and Conformational Entropy Differ in Protein Folding?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the distinction between configurational and conformational entropy in the context of protein folding. Configurational entropy is defined as a combination of conformational and vibrational entropy, as noted by Doig & Sternberg (1995). The participant seeks clarification on whether this conceptualization remains valid or if the terms can be used interchangeably. There is an acknowledgment of potential confusion in the literature regarding these terms, suggesting that the distinctions may not be critical in practical applications. The conversation highlights the relevance of these entropy types in understanding protein thermodynamics, while also recognizing the evolving nature of statistical mechanics in this field.
EFech
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
What is the difference between CONFIGURATION and CONFORMATIONAL entropy in protein folding?
I have been reading about protein thermodynamics and found different types and models for entropy calculation before and after protein folding. I understand Vibrational, conformational, configurational entropy are some of the most studied "types" of protein folding entropy.

My questions is, What is the difference between Configurational and Conformational entropy in protein folding?

According to Doig & Sternberg (1995) Configurational entropy is defined as:
ΔSconfig=ΔSconf+ΔSvib
Although it is most certainly not a linear sum, I understand from this formulation the configurational entropy as a parameter determined by conformational and vibrational entropy in some way.
Is this conceptualization of configurational entropy still valid, or is it incorrect?

I am grateful for your guidance and knowledge, as I keep getting confused by the use of both terms in the literature.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
This appears to me to be a matter of "splitting hairs on cue balls;" statistical mechanics may have evolved sufficiently since I was in grad school to make such distinctions, but...
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
So I understand there is no real need for distinguishing between both?. If so, we can just talk about a configurational or conformational as synonyms?. I understand it study is still relevant for the thermodynamics of protein, in addition to the kinematic study.
 
I caught the tail end of a video about a new application for treating chemical or process waste, which is applied to 'red' mud or contaminated bauxite residue, but the person of interest mention recovering critical minerals from consumer electronics, as well as treating mine tailings and processing ores of rare earth elements. What I found so far is the following: New electrical flash method rapidly purifies red mud into strong ceramics, aluminum feedstock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
414
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
21K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K