How Do Configurational and Conformational Entropy Differ in Protein Folding?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distinction between configurational and conformational entropy in the context of protein folding. Configurational entropy is defined as a combination of conformational and vibrational entropy, as noted by Doig & Sternberg (1995). The participant seeks clarification on whether this conceptualization remains valid or if the terms can be used interchangeably. There is an acknowledgment of potential confusion in the literature regarding these terms, suggesting that the distinctions may not be critical in practical applications. The conversation highlights the relevance of these entropy types in understanding protein thermodynamics, while also recognizing the evolving nature of statistical mechanics in this field.
EFech
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
What is the difference between CONFIGURATION and CONFORMATIONAL entropy in protein folding?
I have been reading about protein thermodynamics and found different types and models for entropy calculation before and after protein folding. I understand Vibrational, conformational, configurational entropy are some of the most studied "types" of protein folding entropy.

My questions is, What is the difference between Configurational and Conformational entropy in protein folding?

According to Doig & Sternberg (1995) Configurational entropy is defined as:
ΔSconfig=ΔSconf+ΔSvib
Although it is most certainly not a linear sum, I understand from this formulation the configurational entropy as a parameter determined by conformational and vibrational entropy in some way.
Is this conceptualization of configurational entropy still valid, or is it incorrect?

I am grateful for your guidance and knowledge, as I keep getting confused by the use of both terms in the literature.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
This appears to me to be a matter of "splitting hairs on cue balls;" statistical mechanics may have evolved sufficiently since I was in grad school to make such distinctions, but...
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
So I understand there is no real need for distinguishing between both?. If so, we can just talk about a configurational or conformational as synonyms?. I understand it study is still relevant for the thermodynamics of protein, in addition to the kinematic study.
 
Thread 'How to make Sodium Chlorate by Electrolysis of salt water?'
I have a power supply for electrolysis of salt water brine, variable 3v to 6v up to 30 amps. Cathode is stainless steel, anode is carbon rods. Carbon rod surface area 42" sq. the Stainless steel cathode should be 21" sq. Salt is pure 100% salt dissolved into distilled water. I have been making saturated salt wrong. Today I learn saturated salt is, dissolve pure salt into 150°f water cool to 100°f pour into the 2 gallon brine tank. I find conflicting information about brine tank...
Engineers slash iridium use in electrolyzer catalyst by 80%, boosting path to affordable green hydrogen https://news.rice.edu/news/2025/engineers-slash-iridium-use-electrolyzer-catalyst-80-boosting-path-affordable-green Ruthenium is also fairly expensive (a year ago it was about $490/ troy oz, but has nearly doubled in price over the past year, now about $910/ troy oz). I tracks prices of Pt, Pd, Ru, Ir and Ru. Of the 5 metals, rhodium (Rh) is the most expensive. A year ago, Rh and Ir...
Back
Top