How Do Consciousness and Search Algorithms Connect?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a TED talk by Dan Dennett that explores the parallels between consciousness in the brain and search algorithms. Participants express a desire for deeper insights into this relationship. Key points include the challenges in defining and understanding consciousness, with a consensus that current definitions are inadequate for meaningful exploration. The conversation distinguishes between two primary views: the materialistic perspective, which considers consciousness a function of brain processes, and dualism, which posits the existence of a soul or spirit. The materialistic view suggests that if consciousness can be mapped as information processing, it may be replicable in computers. However, subjective experience, often referred to as 'qualia,' remains a complex aspect that is difficult to quantify or test, complicating efforts to fully understand or replicate consciousness.
Lightsabertoo
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A very intriguing TED talk discusses the similarities between consciousness arising in the brain (via Dan Dennett)and search algorithms. Would LOVE to get some more detailed insight into this from the community here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGF9NbPFfRo"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computer science news on Phys.org
Welcome to PhysicsForums!

I'm not an AI specialist, a (real) programmer, or even someone who understands emergence, but I do recall Arthur C. Clarke and Steve Baxter using search-engine emergent intelligences as characters in the second of their Time Odyssey novels:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Time_Odyssey

The first two were definitely good reads (haven't picked up the last one, yet)
 
Lightsabertoo said:
A very intriguing TED talk discusses the similarities between consciousness arising in the brain (via Dan Dennett)and search algorithms. Would LOVE to get some more detailed insight into this from the community here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGF9NbPFfRo"

Hey Lightsabertoo and welcome to the forums.

I haven't look at the TED talk you presented yet, but I will look at in the future (I've seen a few TED talks and they have all been very great and informative).

With regards to the discussion of consciousness, our ability to structure and even describe it is not, at least in my opinion, at an acceptable level. In order to work with something and break it down you first have to describe it, and for a thing like consciousness, we don't have really have an apt way to even do this.

When we first have the ability to clarify and describe our conception of what consciousness actually "is", then we will have taken the first step to understanding it and possibly even "replicating" it in some modest form (if not eventually, perhaps entirely), but until we have that ability to describe it, we will not have the ability to understand it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey chiro - i agree that definitions of consciousness are often lacking. however, there are a few ways to look at it to get closer to what it may be.

First off, consciousness is either the brain or a function of the brain (materialistic model) or there is some sort of soul or spirit stuff (dualism)

so if it is the brain, then the 'meat' should not matter and it MUST come down to information processing in the brain.

since information processing can be mapped, we should be able to map consciousness with computers.

if it is soul stuff, well, i guess we may never be able to map it.

In modern philosophy and neuroscience, consciousness is accepted as a function of the brain.
 
I think the most important aspect of consciousness, a subjective experience, is difficult to test in a search engine.
 
i agree with that, however when you look at some of the definitions of consciousness, subjective experience or 'qualia' is just one component. many definitions of consciousness have a very narrow definition, like Dennett's in the TED talk.
 
In my discussions elsewhere, I've noticed a lot of disagreement regarding AI. A question that comes up is, "Is AI hype?" Unfortunately, when this question is asked, the one asking, as far as I can tell, may mean one of three things which can lead to lots of confusion. I'll list them out now for clarity. 1. Can AI do everything a human can do and how close are we to that? 2. Are corporations and governments using the promise of AI to gain more power for themselves? 3. Are AI and transhumans...
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...
Back
Top