How Do Controlled Sources Impact Thevenin Equivalent Calculations?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of controlled sources on Thevenin equivalent calculations in electrical circuits. Participants are analyzing a specific circuit involving resistors and a dependent source, exploring methods to determine the Thevenin resistance and voltage.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the equivalent resistance and attempts to find the open-circuit voltage (Voc) and short-circuit current (Isc), but expresses confusion over discrepancies with textbook values.
  • Another participant questions the placement of Voc in the circuit, suggesting it may not be correctly identified based on the circuit diagram.
  • Further analysis leads to a revised calculation of Voc and va, with one participant noting the need for two equations due to the presence of two variables.
  • Concerns are raised about the treatment of controlled sources, with a participant warning that the Thevenin resistance cannot be simply derived from the resistors alone, as the controlled source affects the circuit's characteristics.
  • A proposed method involves attaching a test source to analyze the circuit for determining Thevenin parameters, suggesting the use of nodal analysis and voltage divider principles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct approach to calculating Thevenin equivalents in the presence of controlled sources. There is no consensus on the correct method or values, and multiple competing views remain regarding the analysis of the circuit.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity introduced by controlled sources, indicating that assumptions about circuit behavior may not hold true without proper analysis. The discussion reflects various methods and interpretations of circuit analysis without resolving the discrepancies in calculations.

Frankenstein19
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
upload_2017-12-11_15-51-25.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


First I found the equivalent resistance since the 3 ohm resistor and 6 ohm resistor are in series. 9ohm. Then I did chose the node where the arrow points to as Voc, which is also va.

KVL:
(va+24V)/9ohm=1.33va
I get va to be 2.18

Then looking for Isc, I close the output terminals and then do kcl again on the node on top of the voltage controlled current source

1.33va-isc-24V/9ohm=0

and get isc=0.23

so Rt=2.18/0.23=9.47

The book says

isc=.24 and Rt=-3

I don't know what I'm doing wrong.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-11_15-51-25.png
    upload_2017-12-11_15-51-25.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 851
Physics news on Phys.org
Frankenstein19 said:
Then I did chose the node where the arrow points to as Voc, which is also va.

That doesn't look right to me. From your picture, it looks like ##V_a## is between the resistors, not at the node above the dependent source.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave and Frankenstein19
Drakkith said:
That doesn't look right to me. From your picture, it looks like ##V_a## is between the resistors, not at the node above the dependent source.
Yikes. ok so if i apply kcl on va i between the resistors i'd have:

(va+24)/3ohm + (voc-va)/6ohm=1.33va

since i have 2 variables i need 2 eq and doing kcl on voc:

(voc-va)/6ohm -24V/9ohm= 1.33va

I get that va is 2.29 and voc is 36.58
 
Frankenstein19 said:
Yikes. ok so if i apply kcl on va i between the resistors i'd have:

(va+24)/3ohm + (voc-va)/6ohm=1.33va

since i have 2 variables i need 2 eq and doing kcl on voc:

(voc-va)/6ohm -24V/9ohm= 1.33va

I get that va is 2.29 and voc is 36.58
It helps if you sound out what your equations are saying. For instance, your first eqn says that the current through the 3Ω plus the current through the 6Ω is equal to the current from the dependent source. Is that what you intend?

direction is consistently clockwise
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
Frankenstein19 said:
Yikes. ok so if i apply kcl on va i between the resistors i'd have:

(va+24)/3ohm + (voc-va)/6ohm=1.33va

since i have 2 variables i need 2 eq and doing kcl on voc:

(voc-va)/6ohm -24V/9ohm= 1.33va

I get that va is 2.29 and voc is 36.58
Like @NascentOxygen said, look at how many different currents you should have in that one loop.
 
Frankenstein19 said:
First I found the equivalent resistance since the 3 ohm resistor and 6 ohm resistor are in series. 9ohm.
Beware! When you have controlled sources like the ##1.33 v_a## source in the network, the effective Thevenin resistance will very likely not be simply a function of the network resistors! The controlled source will actively alter the V vs I characteristics that are "seen" from the output terminals. You cannot simply suppress controlled sources to find the Thevenin resistance. You need to take its effects into account.

A typical way to approach such problems is to attach a "test" source to the output and then analyze the circuit to find the current and voltage at the output, and hence by Ohm's law, the resistance. There are other methods, too. One that I favor involves assuming that there is some load resistance ##R_L## connected to the output, then using nodal analysis to find the voltage across that load resistor. This will yield an expression involving ##R_L##. Since a Thevenin source driving a load resistance is a classic voltage divider circuit, the expression that you find for the output voltage can be manipulated to the form of the standard voltage divider equation, and the Thevenin voltage and Thevenin resistance can be picked out of that equation by inspection :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K