How Do Controlled Sources Impact Thevenin Equivalent Calculations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the impact of controlled sources on Thevenin equivalent calculations in electrical circuits. The participants analyze a circuit with a 3 ohm and a 6 ohm resistor in series, leading to an equivalent resistance of 9 ohms. They emphasize that controlled sources, such as the 1.33v_a source, significantly influence the Thevenin resistance and cannot be ignored during calculations. A recommended approach involves using a test source to determine the output current and voltage, allowing for accurate Thevenin resistance determination.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Thevenin's Theorem
  • Familiarity with Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
  • Knowledge of nodal analysis techniques
  • Basic concepts of controlled sources in electrical circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of controlled sources on Thevenin equivalent circuits
  • Learn how to apply nodal analysis in circuits with dependent sources
  • Explore the use of test sources for determining Thevenin resistance
  • Review voltage divider principles in the context of Thevenin's Theorem
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and professionals involved in circuit analysis and design, particularly those working with Thevenin equivalents and controlled sources.

Frankenstein19
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
upload_2017-12-11_15-51-25.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


First I found the equivalent resistance since the 3 ohm resistor and 6 ohm resistor are in series. 9ohm. Then I did chose the node where the arrow points to as Voc, which is also va.

KVL:
(va+24V)/9ohm=1.33va
I get va to be 2.18

Then looking for Isc, I close the output terminals and then do kcl again on the node on top of the voltage controlled current source

1.33va-isc-24V/9ohm=0

and get isc=0.23

so Rt=2.18/0.23=9.47

The book says

isc=.24 and Rt=-3

I don't know what I'm doing wrong.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-11_15-51-25.png
    upload_2017-12-11_15-51-25.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 845
Physics news on Phys.org
Frankenstein19 said:
Then I did chose the node where the arrow points to as Voc, which is also va.

That doesn't look right to me. From your picture, it looks like ##V_a## is between the resistors, not at the node above the dependent source.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave and Frankenstein19
Drakkith said:
That doesn't look right to me. From your picture, it looks like ##V_a## is between the resistors, not at the node above the dependent source.
Yikes. ok so if i apply kcl on va i between the resistors i'd have:

(va+24)/3ohm + (voc-va)/6ohm=1.33va

since i have 2 variables i need 2 eq and doing kcl on voc:

(voc-va)/6ohm -24V/9ohm= 1.33va

I get that va is 2.29 and voc is 36.58
 
Frankenstein19 said:
Yikes. ok so if i apply kcl on va i between the resistors i'd have:

(va+24)/3ohm + (voc-va)/6ohm=1.33va

since i have 2 variables i need 2 eq and doing kcl on voc:

(voc-va)/6ohm -24V/9ohm= 1.33va

I get that va is 2.29 and voc is 36.58
It helps if you sound out what your equations are saying. For instance, your first eqn says that the current through the 3Ω plus the current through the 6Ω is equal to the current from the dependent source. Is that what you intend?

direction is consistently clockwise
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
Frankenstein19 said:
Yikes. ok so if i apply kcl on va i between the resistors i'd have:

(va+24)/3ohm + (voc-va)/6ohm=1.33va

since i have 2 variables i need 2 eq and doing kcl on voc:

(voc-va)/6ohm -24V/9ohm= 1.33va

I get that va is 2.29 and voc is 36.58
Like @NascentOxygen said, look at how many different currents you should have in that one loop.
 
Frankenstein19 said:
First I found the equivalent resistance since the 3 ohm resistor and 6 ohm resistor are in series. 9ohm.
Beware! When you have controlled sources like the ##1.33 v_a## source in the network, the effective Thevenin resistance will very likely not be simply a function of the network resistors! The controlled source will actively alter the V vs I characteristics that are "seen" from the output terminals. You cannot simply suppress controlled sources to find the Thevenin resistance. You need to take its effects into account.

A typical way to approach such problems is to attach a "test" source to the output and then analyze the circuit to find the current and voltage at the output, and hence by Ohm's law, the resistance. There are other methods, too. One that I favor involves assuming that there is some load resistance ##R_L## connected to the output, then using nodal analysis to find the voltage across that load resistor. This will yield an expression involving ##R_L##. Since a Thevenin source driving a load resistance is a classic voltage divider circuit, the expression that you find for the output voltage can be manipulated to the form of the standard voltage divider equation, and the Thevenin voltage and Thevenin resistance can be picked out of that equation by inspection :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K