How Do Different Types of Forces Affect the Breaking of Glass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mt. Nixion
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A baseball breaks a window primarily due to the transfer of kinetic energy upon impact, which exceeds the material's strength and stiffness. While momentum and pressure contribute to the event, they are not the sole factors in the breaking process. The relationship between kinetic energy and force is crucial, as the energy absorbed during impact can lead to the deformation and breaking of chemical bonds in glass. Glass, being a brittle material, requires relatively little energy to fracture despite its high tensile strength. Additionally, glass is sensitive to sonic vibrations, further highlighting its fragility.
Mt. Nixion
Messages
47
Reaction score
1
What is it that makes a window break when a baseball hits it? Is it Kinetic energy, Momentum, or Pressure?

Also, how does that relate to and differ from force? Not the force that causes a change in acceleration, but deforms an object. When an object is being twisted,
the Stiffness and Strength of an object have to be overcome.

How is using kinetic energy, momentum or pressure to break something relate to and differ from using a force to deform an object?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kinetic energy being absorbed in the breaking of chemical bonds (electrical potential energy). Have a look at the http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm". Glass is brittle, and because of that it actually takes relatively little energy to break it - even though glass has such a high tensile strength, bridges are occasionally built out of it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Glass is probably the most brittle liquid on the planet. In addition to mechanical impact of physical objects, it's also very susceptible to sonic vibrations. (Okay, that wasn't helpful to the thread, but I felt obliged to point it out.):rolleyes:
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top