How Do Earth's Uneven Gravity Fields Affect Spacecraft Flybys?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xyz1971
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
xyz1971
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I rather a strange question in that I'm not a physicist and don't really understand the theories I'm about to mention fully, ok disclaimer over.

My understanding of gravity, is that a mass warps the spacetime in which it sits. Now my question is that ESA's Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) shows gravity isn't equal all over the earth. Surely then that means spacetime isn't distorted uniformly around the earth? Surely this would have an effect on an object depending on the position of the Earth at the time flyby?

Ok maybe not quite such daft a question, but I'm sure there will be a physicist somewhere shaking their head ... :)

Mark

I think in fact I mean the GRACE project not GOCE.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
Welcome o PF!

These irregularities surely have an effect. The point is: these effects are known accurately enough (or so physicists believe), and have been accounted for. The anomaly is what's left after accounting for known effects.
 
xyz1971 said:
Hi,

I rather a strange question in that I'm not a physicist and don't really understand the theories I'm about to mention fully, ok disclaimer over.

My understanding of gravity, is that a mass warps the spacetime in which it sits. Now my question is that ESA's Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) shows gravity isn't equal all over the earth. Surely then that means spacetime isn't distorted uniformly around the earth? Surely this would have an effect on an object depending on the position of the Earth at the time flyby?

Ok maybe not quite such daft a question, but I'm sure there will be a physicist somewhere shaking their head ... :)

Mark

I think in fact I mean the GRACE project not GOCE.
Correct. Basically, it's because the Earth isn't a perfect sphere (it has mountains, valleys, etc., and has a bulge around the equator), and it isn't of uniform density (some rocks are more dense than others).

And it's precisely because these differences in the gravitational field affect these spacecraft s that we are able to measure the differences using the spacecraft in the first place.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top