How Do Greenhouse Gases Interact with Solar and Terrestrial Radiation?

AI Thread Summary
The greenhouse effect is influenced by both solar radiation and terrestrial radiation. Solar rays pass through the atmosphere, where some radiation is absorbed by greenhouse gases, but the majority reaches the Earth's surface. Once the surface emits heat, greenhouse gases absorb this terrestrial radiation effectively. The interaction between different wavelengths of radiation plays a crucial role in this process. The discussion highlights the complexity of the greenhouse effect and its connection to broader climate change topics.
vanmaiden
Messages
101
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I learned that the solar radiation entering the atmosphere heats up the Earth's surface and the heat then radiates from the surface to the rest of the atmosphere. Is the greenhouse effect mostly dependent on the heat radiating from the surface, or do the greenhouse gases absorb a good quantity of heat as well when the solar rays move through the atmosphere?

Homework Equations


NA

The Attempt at a Solution


Since the solar rays have to pass through a good amount of atmosphere to get to the surface, it seems like a lot of radiation would be absorbed by the gases en route.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_effect" you can believe vis-a-vis the mechanism of the greenhouse effect.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are different wavelengths at work. Radiation passing through the atmosphere on its way down is not absorbed, while radiation emitted up by the Earth surface is absorbed, hence the difference.

Please note that greenhouse effect is a part of controversial topic of global warming, temporarily banned from PF. That means - depending on how the thread evolves - we may have to close it.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top