How Do He-Ne LASERs Prevent Electron Ionization and Manage Emissions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter precise
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laser
precise
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
1. Won't the electrons get knocked out of the atom during the pumping action instead of just getting excited to higher energy level in LASERS?

2. why doesn't the electron in meta stable state(higher energy state) go to much higher energy level during STIMULATED emission instead of losing energy and emitting a photon? This is the opposite of ionization of the atom, if I'm not wrong.

3.Finally, what happens to the light emitted by spontaneous emission in HE-Ne laser? Won't it mix with the LASER light?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Won't the electrons get knocked out of the atom during the pumping action instead of just getting excited to higher energy level in LASERS?
I guess that can happen, but it does not contribute to the laser action.
2. why doesn't the electron in meta stable state(higher energy state) go to much higher energy level during STIMULATED emission instead of losing energy and emitting a photon?
Stimulated emission means it emits an additional photon, so it has to lose energy.
There is no higher energy level with the right energy difference to reach with those photons.
This is the opposite of ionization of the atom, if I'm not wrong.
No, as there are no free electrons involved.
3.Finally, what happens to the light emitted by spontaneous emission in HE-Ne laser? Won't it mix with the LASER light?
It is part of the emitted light, yes.
 
Thanks mfb for the response. I have got one more question.

When we say the LASER is coherent, what does it mean? What does it mean to be non-coherent? What does a monochromatic, non-divergent and COHERENT light has that a monochromatic, non-divergent and NON-COHERENT lacks? Does it have less number of photons per unit area per unit time or is it energy of each photon is it something else?
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top