How Do I Balance This Redox Reaction Using Redox Number or Half Equation Method?

AI Thread Summary
To balance the redox reaction Na2S + Ag + HNO3 + Na2CrO4 → Ag2S + Cr(NO3)3 + NaNO3, the half-equation method is suggested, emphasizing the need to recognize oxidizing and reducing agents. It is clarified that adding AgNO3 as a product is unnecessary and that water must be included on the product side to account for hydrogen. The balanced net ionic equation provided is 8 H+ + CrO42- + 3 Ag → 3 Ag+ + Cr3+ + 4 H2O, but it requires doubling the coefficients to maintain balance, particularly for Ag2S. Participants highlight that coefficients must be modified simultaneously to keep the redox skeleton balanced. The discussion concludes with a clarification on why having an uneven number of Ag on both sides is chemically inconsistent.
Gorby
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Can somebody help me balance this redox reaction using either the redox number method or the half equation method? Thank You

Na2S + Ag + HNO3 + Na2CrO4 ----> Ag2S + Cr(NO3)3 + NaNO3

Can you please explain your steps.

Thank You

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using both methods, but I find that I have to add AgNO3 as a product to the right side. I've been told that I cannot do this, can someone explain why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can't be balanced as entered, as there is no hydrogen on the right, you need to add water to products.

There is no need for AgNO3 on the RHS.

Have you recognized what is being oxidized and what is being reduced?

Chemically it doesn't make sense to me - sulfide is a reducing agent, nitric acid is an oxidizing agent, I don't see why they are just spectators.
 
Borek said:
It can't be balanced as entered, as there is no hydrogen on the right, you need to add water to products.

There is no need for AgNO3 on the RHS.

Have you recognized what is being oxidized and what is being reduced?

Chemically it doesn't make sense to me - sulfide is a reducing agent, nitric acid is an oxidizing agent, I don't see why they are just spectators.

Yes, our instructor taught us to add in water as a product while doing the solution.

This is what I get for my balanced net ionic equation, but I do not know what to do from there. Can someone help me put this back into the original equation:

8 H+ + CrO42- + 3 Ag ---> 3 Ag+ + Cr3+ + 4 H2O

I was told that I had to double the above, for the original equation to balance. I do not know why, and I am not sure how to do it either.
 
Gorby said:
8 H+ + CrO42- + 3 Ag ---> 3 Ag+ + Cr3+ + 4 H2O

Thats OK.

I was told that I had to double the above, for the original equation to balance. I do not know why, and I am not sure how to do it either.

You need an even number of Ag+ for Ag2S.

Simply multiply all coefficients by 2, add on the left enough S2- to convert all Ag+ on RHS to Ag2S, see how many Na+ you are missing and so on. One thing you can't do - you can't modify coefficients of the above redox equation separately, if you need to modify them, you have to modify all at the same time (this way redox skeleton stays always balanced).
 
Borek said:
Thats OK.
You need an even number of Ag+ for Ag2S.

Simply multiply all coefficients by 2, add on the left enough S2- to convert all Ag+ on RHS to Ag2S, see how many Na+ you are missing and so on. One thing you can't do - you can't modify coefficients of the above redox equation separately, if you need to modify them, you have to modify all at the same time (this way redox skeleton stays always balanced).

I see, that makes sense. I am wondering why it is not ok to have 3 Ag on the left side and then have Ag2S along with an Ag+ ion by itself on the right side; so that there are 3 Ag on both sides.
 
It wouldn't be completely incorrect, just doesn't make much chemical sense.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top