How do I calculate pixels number

  • Thread starter Thread starter Telushomey
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the pixel difference for children's eyes in 3D video, the adult standard of 2.5 inches corresponds to 52 pixels, with each eye receiving 26 pixels. For children, with a distance of 2.0 inches, a proportionate calculation suggests a pixel difference of approximately 39 pixels total, or about 19 pixels for each eye. The discussion emphasizes the importance of adjusting these values for proper parallax in 3D video. The calculations rely on proportional reasoning to determine the necessary pixel adjustments for different eye distances.
Telushomey
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Adults need 2.5" between Eyes, but this is too far for kids eyes.
Adults = 2.5" = 52 Pixels difference = left eye 26 pixels, Right eye 26 pixels
Kids = 2.0" = ? Pixels = Left eye ? Pixels = Right eye ? Pixels (less than 26 each eye is all I know)

This is to calculate the parallax in 3D video. I need to know how much pixels kids use, and all I know is it's less than the 52 pixels for Adults eyes.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Telushomey said:
Adults need 2.5" between Eyes, but this is too far for kids eyes.
Adults = 2.5" = 52 Pixels difference = left eye 26 pixels, Right eye 26 pixels
Kids = 2.0" = ? Pixels = Left eye ? Pixels = Right eye ? Pixels (less than 26 each eye is all I know)
I have no idea what you're trying to say here.
Telushomey said:
This is to calculate the parallax in 3D video. I need to know how much pixels kids use, and all I know is it's less than the 52 pixels for Adults eyes.
??
 
So 2.5" is equivalent to 52 Pixels, or 52 pixels = 2.5" inches difference.
52 Pixels = 26 Pixels * 2 (26 pixels each eye)

I need to know how many pixels if the inches used is 2.0 inches difference, not 2.5 inches.
I think I need to use division but don't know how.
 
Use a proportion. 2.5/2.0 = 52/x

What kind of a screen is this you're working with? ~20 pixels/inch seems very low resolution to me.
 
Mark44 said:
Use a proportion. 2.5/2.0 = 52/x

What kind of a screen is this you're working with? ~20 pixels/inch seems very low resolution to me.

It's not resolution, it's for cropping to make parallax either negative or positive.

Maybe this is the way?

2.5 / 2.0 = 1.25
52*1.25 =65
65 - 52 = 13
52 - 13 = 39
38 / 2 = 19 pixels difference each eye.

Thank you Mark44!
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top