How do I calculate the peak velocity of a 1kg object dropped 1m onto a spring?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aliendoom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Springs
Click For Summary
To calculate the peak velocity of a 1kg object dropped 1m onto a spring, the maximum speed occurs when the gravitational force equals the spring force, which can be expressed using energy conservation principles. The equation mv² + kx² + 2mgx = mv₀² is central to this calculation, where mv² represents kinetic energy, kx² is the spring potential energy, and 2mgx accounts for gravitational potential energy. The peak velocity can be derived by determining the point of maximum compression of the spring, where x = mg/k, leading to the expression v_max = √(v₀² + mg²/k). The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly defining coordinate systems and understanding the signs of forces and energies involved in the calculations. Ultimately, the peak velocity is reached just before the object begins to decelerate due to the spring's compression.
  • #31
Integral said:
The negative sign IS the direction. In my set up the coordinate system x increases up. So a negative velocity is going down. Note that in the initial conditions the initial velocity is negative. When speaking of velocities we must specify direction and magnitude, in this case negative means down. when looking for the min or max velocity it only makes sense to speak of the magnitude. Direction does not matter.

The question was peak velocity. Cannot it be positive as well? What do you think will happen after the body reaches that maximum negative velocity? I admit that "maximum peak velocity" means velocity of maximum magnitude, but this body moves first downward then upward so its peak velocities are both positive and negative, aren't they?

ehild
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
What makes you think the object will move faster going upward than downward?
 
  • #33
HallsofIvy said:
What makes you think the object will move faster going upward than downward?

Oh my... My English must be very bad. I can not make myself understand. No, I did not say that the peak speed is higher upward than downward.
Well, Integral said that the maximum velocity was negative.

Integral said:
V_{max}= - \sqrt { {V_i} ^2 + \frac {m g^2} k

I wanted to say that the body reaches the same maximum SPEED both downward and upward, and I argued about the minus sign in Integral's post. It should be

V_{max}= \pm \sqrt { {V_i} ^2 + \frac {m g^2} k

if we speak about velocity, and just

V_{max}= \sqrt { {V_i} ^2 + \frac {m g^2} k

if it is speed.

ehild
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
Ideally each time the mass/spring combination oscillates past the point I called xmax it will have the same velocity. My solution is specific to a TIME at the TIME I found the ball is moving down. Notice that my solution is oscillatory in nature, so with a bit more effort I could find a sequence of times at which the ball passes through the point at which it has a maximum velocity.

Now, if it is not an ideal spring and losses are occurring which are not captured in our simple model, then when the spring/ball returns it will NOT be traveling at the same speed. So I could argue that the ONLY time the ball/spring system will have that maximum velocity is on the way down the first time.

Notice that the energy based solution the final result is found after taking the square root, by all rights you should take the negative root as the correct solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K