How do I calculate thickness needed for a retaining wall?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joe17857
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thickness Wall
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

To calculate the thickness needed for a retaining wall for a pond, consider the depth and area of the pond, shear strength, unconfined compressive strength of the retaining material, and the length of the wall. A factor of safety of 1.7 should be applied in the calculations. Engaging with a local inspector early in the planning process is crucial to ensure compliance with requirements and to streamline inspections. For modeling and simulating the retaining wall design, using Optum G2 is recommended, as it provides upper and lower bound limit analysis for geotechnical problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of shear strength and unconfined compressive strength of materials
  • Knowledge of retaining wall design principles
  • Familiarity with factors of safety in engineering
  • Basic skills in using geotechnical analysis tools like Optum G2
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calculation methods for retaining wall thickness using geotechnical principles
  • Learn how to apply factors of safety in structural engineering
  • Explore the features and functionalities of Optum G2 for geotechnical modeling
  • Consult local building codes and regulations regarding retaining wall inspections
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, construction professionals, and anyone involved in designing or inspecting retaining walls for ponds or similar structures will benefit from this discussion.

joe17857
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I need to calculate the thickness needed for a retaining wall for a pond. The information I have is as follows:

Depth of pond, area of pond, shear strength of retaining material, unconfined compressive strength of retaining material, length of retaining wall (will only be on one side of pond). There will be no slope on the retaining wall.

How do I calculate the thickness of the retaining wall with a 1.7 factor of safety?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In my experiences in the trades, talking to the local inspector who will ultimately review the plans, and inspect the work is the most direct course of action.

Stop in his office, when he has office hours, and tell him you are there to make sure you satisfy HIS requirements, and he will usually take a liking to you, and your approach. After all, he doesn't want to visit your site more than he has to (they hate re-inspections), and he doesn't want to have an argument with you later, to get you to change your plan/prints to conform to his requirements - talking to him first, puts him in the driver's seat. It also greases the wheels of the inspection process, since he will already be intimately familiar with your project, before he arrives to inspect, or for that matter, before he reviews your construction plans. It can also save you a lot of time re-doing your work, whether it be on paper, or in the field, since you will know what he expects, before you even start drawing the plans.

Even if the location precludes an inspection requirement, the inspector can still be an invaluable resource. You pay his salary with your taxes - why not put him to work for you? If he mentions that a permit/inspection process is not required, just let him know that you have safety concerns, and you wanted to consult an expert authority on the project. More likely than not, he'll spend at least SOME time with you.

If you are looking for a purely academic answer, I'll leave that to others who are more familiar with the math involved.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
For a tool-based approach to model and simulate your problem, or to cross check your own calculations, you might want to consider using a tool like Optum G2 which I know is used for providing upper and lower bound limit analysis (collapse) for real-world geotechnical problems. The tool is not free, but has a free trial. For sake of complete disclosure, I recently started as a software engineer at the company making this simulation tool and should be able offer help with the tool itself but I will have to refrain from offering any advice on the actual geotechnical modelling of your problem as that is well outside my area of professional expertise.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K