How Do I Calculate Time as a Function of Distance for Two Electrons in a Vacuum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rebeka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vacuum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving time as a function of distance for two electrons in a vacuum, starting from their initial conditions. The user struggles with integrating acceleration and applying energy conservation principles to solve the problem. Key insights include recognizing acceleration as a function of distance and using energy conservation to simplify the integration process. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between velocity, distance, and acceleration in solving such physics problems. Ultimately, the user expresses relief in finally grasping the concept after much contemplation.
rebeka
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Five years ago I posted this question. At the time it was difficult for me to understand almost all of what I was trying to learn and was very frustrated. I put it down and studied other stuff including math. I just looked at this question again and am finding myself still unable to derive any answers.

I'm having some trouble with a pretty basic question and I'm not sure what I'm missing that will correct my thinking. If I have two electrons in a vacuum and they are set at arbitrary origins at a correspondingly arbitrary fixed distance between them with initial velocity 0 how do I find time as a function of distance?

I'm looking at this like so:
a(r) = k_{e} \frac{q^{2}}{m \cdot r^{2}}

where a is acceleration, r is the distance between the two electrons, k_{e} is the Coulomb Constant, m is two times the electron mass and q is the charge on one electron. Both electrons are allowed to move freely!

I feel that plotting acceleration as a function of distance would be useful but I'm not seeing how to integrate in time? What am I missing about the mathematics which is also probably rather elementary and is preventing me from logically thinking this through?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For these kind of problems, you use the energy conservation.
E=\frac{1}{2}m\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^{2} + V(x) \ \ \rightarrow \ \ \frac{dx}{dt} = \pm \sqrt{2[E-V(x)]/m}
\rightarrow \ \ dt=\pm \frac{dx}{\sqrt{2[E-V(x)]/m}}

\pm in the expression is determined by the initial condition of the problem. (for example, whether they approaching or moving away from each other?)
 
Thank you for redirecting my approach!
 
While weejee is absolutely correct in everything he did, We can solve this problem
from first principles, just the way you asked. [and it includes a common physics-trick,
which is probably good to see used.] The energy is sometimes called a FIRST INTEGRAL
of the motion. meaning we get it when we integrate the equations of motion 1 time.

start from a = (kq^2)/(mr^2)
recognize a = dv/dt = d^2r/dt^2
[the trick]
\frac{dv}{dt} = \frac{dv}{dr}\frac{dr}{dt} = v \frac{dv}{dr}

So that
v\frac{dv}{dr} = \frac{k q^2}{m r^2}
or
\int_{v_0}^v v dv = \frac{k q^2}{m} \int_{r_0}^r r^{-2} dr
or
\frac{v^2}{2} - \frac{v_0^2}{2} = \frac{k q^2}{m} <br /> \left( \frac{1}{r_0} - \frac{1}{r} \right)

Now this can be rearranged a-la weejee.

---
of course, we really wouldn't want to do this integral from scratch everytime
for each different force F that we run into. If the force is conservative (i.e. the
gradient of some potential) we can do this one time to arive at the law of
conservation of energy -- and from then on just use conservation of energy.
 
That's awesome ... I wish I had come up with this myself with all the time I spent trying to figure it out ... but I'm glad to get it out of my head, it's been stuck there for a while. Thanks again!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top