How do I do this with KCL and KVL

  • Thread starter Thread starter strk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kcl Kvl
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around applying Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to solve a circuit analysis problem. Participants explore various methods to approach the problem, including mesh and node analysis, while sharing their attempts and results.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that since x2 is 2a and x3 is 3a, then x5 should be 5a, but expresses uncertainty about the next steps.
  • Another participant recommends performing mesh analysis followed by node analysis, emphasizing a step-by-step approach.
  • There is a request for clarification on what mesh analysis and node analysis entail.
  • A participant explains that KCL corresponds to node analysis and KVL corresponds to mesh analysis, urging the original poster to show their work for feedback.
  • One participant shares their KVL results, providing values for various voltages and currents but expresses doubt about their correctness.
  • Another participant suggests verifying the results using KCL and Ohm's law, indicating that this is a standard method for validation.
  • A later reply provides detailed calculations for currents and voltages using KCL, presenting a different set of results and emphasizing the importance of sign conventions.
  • There is a reiteration of the need to be cautious with signs, highlighting a common source of confusion in circuit analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correctness of the calculations presented. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the application of KCL and KVL, as well as the interpretation of results.

Contextual Notes

Some participants' calculations depend on assumptions about the circuit configuration and the definitions of currents and voltages. There are unresolved questions about the accuracy of the values derived from KVL and KCL.

strk
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q292/strkthug/KCL/kclandkvl.png



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I think since x2 is 2a and x3 is 3a then x5 should be 5a
and I have no idead where to go from there
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, do a mesh analysis. Then, do a node analysis. Just do it one step at a time and you'll get it.
 
staticd said:
First, do a mesh analysis. Then, do a node analysis. Just do it one step at a time and you'll get it.

what is mesh analysis and node analysis? how do I even start that out
 
I assume that you've been taught what KCL and KVL are.

Therefore, you know that in each of the three loops (or, meshes), the sum of the voltages (i * r) or x, in this case equals zero. That give you three equations. Start there and see what you get.

Watch the signs!
 
strk said:
what is mesh analysis and node analysis? how do I even start that out

Since the problem asks you to use KCL and KVL, we will assume that you know what they are. strk was just using alternate common names for them:

KCL = node (nodal) analysis

KVL = mesh analysis

Please show us your work, if you'd like us to check your answers.
 
i tried to solve it by KVL using signs of currents and got these:
Vx3=-1
Ix5=-5
Vx2=-4
Ix4=-3
but i don't know wether its right or not
 
I don't have time to check right now. However, you should be able to verify your answers using KCL and/or Ohm's law. That is the normal method to show yourself that the value you have found is correct...
 
Hosam_IT said:
i tried to solve it by KVL using signs of currents and got these:
Vx3=-1
Ix5=-5
Vx2=-4
Ix4=-3
but i don't know wether its right or not

Okay, my answers are a little different.

For all of the currents that you don't know, you can do KCL --

So, we need to find Ix4 and Ix5.

For, Ix4, let's look at the node where x4,2, and 1 meet.

There you have...

1A + 2A = Ix4 --> Ix4 = 3A

for, Ix5, let's look at the node where x2, 3, and 5 meet.

There you have...

3A + 2A + Ix5 = 0 --> Ix5 = -5A

Now, you have three more voltages to find; Vx2, 3, and 1.

For the loop with x4, 2, and 5, you have...

-1V - 3V + Vx2 = 0 --> Vx2 = 4V

For the loop with x5 and x3, you have...

-Vx3 + 1 = 0 --> Vx3 = 1V

For the loop with x2, 3, and 1, you have...

Vx1 + 1V - 4V = 0 --> Vx1 = 3V

I hope that helps... Watch your signs! Start with what you KNOW and take small steps to find the solution!
 
Last edited:
staticd said:
Okay, my answers are a little different.

For all of the currents that you don't know, you can do KCL --

So, we need to find Ix4 and Ix5.

For, Ix4, let's look at the node where x4,2, and 1 meet.

There you have...

1A + 2A = Ix4 --> Ix4 = 3A

for, Ix5, let's look at the node where x2, 3, and 5 meet.

There you have...

3A + 2A + Ix5 = 0 --> Ix5 = -5A

Now, you have three more voltages to find; Vx2, 3, and 1.

For the loop with x4, 2, and 5, you have...

-1V - 3V + Vx2 = 0 --> Vx2 = 4V

For the loop with x5 and x3, you have...

-Vx3 + 1 = 0 --> Vx3 = 1V

For the loop with x2, 3, and 1, you have...

Vx1 + 1V - 4V = 0 --> Vx1 = 3V

I hope that helps... Watch your signs! Start with what you KNOW and take small steps to find the solution!

that's right you got same answers by using its directions
 
  • #10
Right, Hosam. However, you have to know that 4V does not equal -4V! Very tricky. Very tricky, indeed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K