How do I evaluate a surface integral with parametric equations?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a surface integral defined by parametric equations. The specific integral involves the expression yz dS over a surface parameterized by x=(u^2), y=usinv, z=ucosv, with specified bounds for u and v.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the normal vector using the cross product of the parameterization derivatives. There is uncertainty regarding the correctness of the computed normal vector and its implications on the integral.

Discussion Status

Some participants have pointed out potential errors in the original poster's calculations, particularly regarding the normal vector and the interpretation of the integral. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct formulation of the problem, with suggestions for recalculating certain components.

Contextual Notes

Participants question the definition of the vector field F, noting that yz is a scalar quantity, which may affect the interpretation of the integral. There is a lack of consensus on the correct approach to the problem, highlighting the need for clarification on the setup.

fk378
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Evaluate the double integral of yz dS. S is the surface with parametric equations x=(u^2), y=usinv, z=ucosv, 0<u<1, 0<v<(pi/2)

(all the "less than" signs signify "less than or equal to" here)


Homework Equations



double integral of dot product of (F) and normal vector over the domain

The Attempt at a Solution


When I solved for the normal vector, I crossed r_u X r_v and got 5u^4.

Then I solved the double integral of (u^4)sinvcosv(5u^4) dudv. u is from 0-->1 and v is from 0-->pi/2

My final answer came out to be pi/12, but it's wrong. Can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fk378 said:
When I solved for the normal vector, I crossed r_u X r_v and got 5u^4.
I didn't get 5u^4.
 
Can I point out that you don't have an F vector? yz is a scalar.
 
I think he miswrote it. It was probably a scalar surface integral.
 
Recalculate [itex]|\vec{r}_u\times \vec{r}_v|[/itex] it is not 5u4. I think you have a "u4" at one point where you should have a "u2".
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K