How do i find k in the banach fixed point theorem

AI Thread Summary
To find k in the Banach fixed point theorem for the function f(x) = 1 + 3x - x^2 on the interval [1,2], first confirm that the function is a contraction. Then, set up the equation f(k) = k, which leads to the equation 1 + 3k - k^2 = k. Rearranging gives the quadratic equation -k^2 + 2k + 1 = 0. Solve this equation to find the value of k within the specified interval. The process involves basic algebra to determine the fixed point.
sara_87
Messages
748
Reaction score
0
how do i find k in the banach fixed point theorem.
so say i have a function f(x)=1+3x-x^2 in the interval [1,2]
then how do i find k?

thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It looks to be obvious that that function is a contraction, so apply the definition of a fixed point (k \in [1,2] such that F(k) = k).

TeX is being weird so I don't know if what I said shows up properly.
 
Last edited:
jhicks said:
It looks to be obvious that that function is a contraction, so apply the definition of a fixed point (k \in [1,2] such that F(k) = k).

TeX is being weird so I don't know if what I said shows up properly.

yes but how do i find that k?
 
you know that f(k) = k. It's just algebra. What is f(k)?
 
but what do i put as k?
what value of x isit?
 
k is what you are trying to find! F(k)= 1- 3k- k3 so F(k)= k is just 1- 3k- k2= k. Solve that equation!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top