How do I Find \nabla in Spherical Coordinates?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the gradient operator \nabla in spherical coordinates. The key formula presented is \nabla u = \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\vec{i} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\vec{j} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial z}\vec{k}, with an emphasis on using the chain rule for partial derivatives. The transformation from Cartesian to spherical coordinates involves calculating derivatives of the radius ρ, polar angle θ, and azimuthal angle φ. Specific derivatives such as \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial x} = \frac{\rho \cos(\theta) \sin(\phi)}{\rho} are derived, illustrating the tedious nature of the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus and the gradient operator.
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinate transformations.
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and the chain rule.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and symbols.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the gradient in spherical coordinates using resources like Wikipedia's spherical coordinate system page.
  • Practice calculating partial derivatives in spherical coordinates.
  • Explore applications of the gradient operator in physics, particularly in electromagnetism and fluid dynamics.
  • Learn about the divergence and curl operators in spherical coordinates for a comprehensive understanding of vector calculus.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector calculus and need to apply the gradient operator in spherical coordinates.

squenshl
Messages
468
Reaction score
4
How do I find \nabla in Spherical Coordinates. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do I go about doing it from scratch.
How do I find i, j, & k from the definition of \nabla
 
Last edited:
\nabla = del/del(x) i + del/del(y) j + del/del(z) k
I found del/del(x), del/del)(y), del/del(z) but how do I find i, j, k. Help please.
 
Have you looked at the site tiny-tim gives? No one is going to go through the whole thing just for you! It's not terribly deep but very tedious!

Here's a start only:

Since \nabla u= \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\vec{j}+ \frac{\partial u}{\partial z}\vec{k}
so you need to use the chain rule

\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial u}{\partial \rho}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial x}+ \frac{\partial u}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x}+ \frac{\partial u}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}

Since \rho= (x^2+ y^2+ z^2)^{1/2},
\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial x}= (1/2)(x^2+ y^2+ z^2)^{-1/2}(2x}= \frac{\rho cos(\theta)sin(\phi)}{\rho}= cos(\theta)sin(\phi)
and similarly for the others.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K