How do I find the inverse of x^3/x^2+1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bardagath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
Bardagath
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have been working on this problem for a while now and can't seem to get it into a forum which would isolate x, which would then allow me to sub y and find the inverse.

The problem is x^3/x^2+1

Can anyone help me with this? I am utterly stuck

I have dealt with a similar problem before... x+1/x-1... the trick for that was to express the statement twice, once with x-1 in the numerator and x+2 in the numerator... which would cancel the first statement and isolate x etc.

However, this problem we have a cube and a square in the numerator and the denomator.

Can someone please help?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Bardagath said:
Hello,

I have been working on this problem for a while now and can't seem to get it into a forum which would isolate x, which would then allow me to sub y and find the inverse.

The problem is x^3/x^2+1
Presumably you mean f(x) = x3/(x2 + 1). What you wrote would be interpreted as (x3/x2) + 1 = x + 1.
Bardagath said:
Can anyone help me with this? I am utterly stuck

I have dealt with a similar problem before... x+1/x-1...
The similar problem was y = (x + 1)/(x - 1), I'm pretty sure.
Bardagath said:
the trick for that was to express the statement twice, once with x-1 in the numerator and x+2 in the numerator... which would cancel the first statement and isolate x etc.
(x + 1)/(x - 1) = (x - 1 + 2)/(x - 1) = (x - 1)/(x - 1) + 2/(x - 1) = 1 + 2/(x - 1). Is this what you're talking about? If so, it's fairly easy to solve the equation y = 1 + 2/(x - 1) for x.
Bardagath said:
However, this problem we have a cube and a square in the numerator and the denomator.

Can someone please help?

Thanks
Solving the equation y = x3/(x2 + 1) for x is possible, but pretty difficult.

Multiply both sides by x2 + 1:
y(x2 + 1) = x3

Expand the left side and bring all terms to the left side:
yx2 + y - x3 = 0

Rearrange by powers of x:
-x3 + yx2 + y = 0

Solving for x amounts to finding the solutions of this cubic equation, a technique that has been around for a long time, but isn't usually taught.
 
Thanks so much,

I was afraid I'd be left in this form. Oh well, must use Cardano's equation now...

Thankyou very much
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top