How do i perform a measurement of a many body system?

spocchio
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
first of all, I'm a new bie of QM,

with q1,p1 and q2,p2 the couples of position and momentum
THE QUESTION IS: can I just measure a \hat{q1} with no measure of \hat{q2}? and how? and how I calculate the new wave function with the dependece of q2?

I hope that \hat{q1}|q1,q2>=q1|q1,q2> is true
if so when i have a certain state |\phi>
and I measure q1 i'll obtain a new state like |phi>=|q1,q2> with a probability of
|<q1,q2|\phi>|^2
but wath q2 have I to choose?
but, does it have sense? the q2 dependece vanish!? where I'm wrong?

it could seems a bit confusing, sure as i am.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're touching on what is called symmetrization of the wave function. The probability distribution associated with the many-body state is given by |u(x1,x2)|^2 whe u is the many body wave function. We require that this be the same upon exchange of particle label, because we cannot in principle label quantum mechanical particles. That means |u(x1, x2)|^2 = |u(x2,x1)|^2. So it doesn't matter which position operator you use, they're all equivalent. The condition of the wave function itself is not unique mathematically. I.E. we could have u(x1,x2) differ from u(x2,x1) by some complex phase. However, in 3-dimensions symmetries of space-time require that u(x1,x2)=u(x2,x1) or u(x1,x2) = -u(x2,x1) (Ihave neglected the spin symmetries associated with the state. The former is true for bosons and the latter for fermions.
 
Oh, you are just making things more complicated...
as I know these problems of symmetries are forced in QM, they don't came from any
principal postulate.
I don't want to deal about these symmetries problems.
I think this problem of many bodies is mathematically equivalent to a problem of 1 body in N dimensions..
for example q1=x,q2=y for a free particle in 2D

so, the new version of the problem is:
for a particle in N Dimension, how do I perform a measurement in only one coordinate?
for example, with a slit.
 
That's incorrect. For a general system the wavefunction is a nonseperable scalar function of 3N arguments and contains all of the relevant information about the state of the system given the Hilbert space.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top