How do I prove the identity sin(4x) = 4sin(x)cos^3(x)-4sin^3(x)cos(x)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Slicktacker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    identities
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the trigonometric identity sin(4x) = 4sin(x)cos^3(x) - 4sin^3(x)cos(x). Participants suggest using the double angle formula for sine and factoring the right-hand side to simplify the proof. They also mention that proving identities can be approached using complex numbers or De Moivre's theorem for a more algebraic method. The conversation emphasizes that memorizing identities is less important than understanding how to derive them. Ultimately, the goal is to demonstrate the equivalence of both sides of the identity through various mathematical techniques.
Slicktacker
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I have a question proving an identity:

sin(4x) = 4sin(x)cos^3(x)-4sin^3(x)cos(x)

I can't seem to figure it out. I know I should be using the known identities:

sin(2x) = 2sin(x)cos(x)

and probably:

cos(2x) = 1-2sin^2(x)

but I'm stuck. Please help!

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First hint, apply your double angle formula for sin to:

sin(2(2x))

what do you get?

Second hint, try factoring the right hand side to help see what identities you'll need:

sin(4x) = 4sin(x)cos(x)(cos^2(x)-sin^2(x))

How does this compare to your answer above? Can you see where the factors come from?
 
Mathematicians never memorize trig identities. Trig identities are proven using complex numbers. You can if you wish try to prove your identity with complex numbers, you may find it may be easier. If I can remember correctly cos(x)=(e^(ix) +e^(-ix))/2 and sin(x) = (e^(ix))-e^(-ix))/2i (someone correct me if I am wrong). From there all you have to do is algebra instead of working with identities to get the left side= to the right side.
 
Rather one may also use D'Moivre,
(cos4x+isin4x) = (cosx+isinx)^4
expand RHS and compare imaginary parts ... as a bonus u also get cos4x :P
 
let me try
sin (4x) = 4 sin x cos *3 x - 4 sin *3 ( x ) cos ( x)

let 2x = X
sin 2X = 2 sin X cos X
=2 sin 2x cos 2x
=2 [( 2sinx cosx ) ( cos*2 x - sin *2 x ) ]
=2 [ 2sinxcos*3 x - 2sin*3cos x ]
= 4sinx cos*3 x - 4sin*3 x cos x
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top