How do I rearrange this equation to solve for B?

  • Thread starter Thread starter martine
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve for B in the equation A = 1.27*B^0.45, first rearrange it to B = (A/1.27)^(1/0.45). When A is given as 2.5, calculate B by substituting into the rearranged equation, resulting in B approximately equal to 4.507. The discrepancy when calculating A from a guessed B arises from rounding errors, as calculations may yield slightly different results due to decimal precision. It's essential to account for these rounding effects when verifying results. Understanding the relationship and proper rearrangement will clarify the calculations.
martine
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
I'm almost a bit ashamed to ask, but for some reason I'm stuck. Being a bit thick today I guess.

Given is an empirical relationship
A = 1.27*B^0.45
A = given. Say 2.5

What is B?

For some reason, if I take a random but plausible B and calculate A, I get a different result then when I take the resultant A and try to result at the B I just made up. Either I can't rearrange equations anymore, or this relationship only works in one direction. Sounds silly...

Help, please?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It would have helped if you had shown exactly what numbers you used and what numbers you got.

If, for example, we take B= 5, then A= 1.27(5^.45)= 1.27(2.0632)= 2.6202. Going the other way, if A= 2.6202, then 2.6202= 1.27(B^.45) so B^.45= 2.6202/1.27= 2.0632 and then B= (2.0632)^(1/.45)= 2.0632^2.222= 4.999 which rounds to 5.

That rounding may be what you are talking about. Even if you use a calculator which shows, say 10 decimal places, it is working, internally, to several more decimal places so you can't expect to get exactly what you started with- it should be the same up to the last one or two decimal places, however.
 
Suppose you have the equation:

A=C*B^d.

Then, B, in terms of the other numbers is:
B=(A/C)^(1/d)
 
Simple.
Take 2.5/1.27 and get 1.969
Take 1.969 and raise it to the (1/.45).
You get 4.507.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top