How do I refute or prove this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monsu
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the composition of functions, specifically regarding the notation f o g = (lambda)x.x and its implications for inverses. Participants express uncertainty about the definitions of lambda calculus elements, such as the meaning of x and the dot notation. There is a consensus that f o g is not a valid function under standard composition rules, which read from right to left. Additionally, the concept of an inverse function is clarified, emphasizing that if f has an inverse, it should be denoted as f^-1: B->A, not as g. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities and misunderstandings in function composition and notation in mathematical contexts.
Monsu
Messages
38
Reaction score
1
How do I refute or prove this?!

If f o g = (lambda)x.x, then f^-1 = g

given that f:A -> B and g:B -> C
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
i don't think i understand the problem. if f has an inverse, it would be f^-1: B->A; it wouldn't be that function g as defined.
 
once more, fog is not a function, monsu, the standard is to read from right to left when composing functions. and the first part of your question makes no sense to me. Pretend you don't know what the question is and read it as if for the first time.

what is lambda, why is it in brackets, what is x, what is the dot between the xs? are you multiplying things? what's the input in fog (which isn't even a function?) is it a lambda or an x, or an x.x?
 
You are right Matt, it isn't even a function... my brain seams to be damaging with work overload! Thank you so much, once again!
 
Thanks to you too fourier!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
577
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top