How do I solve a uniform motion problem without knowing the distance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Richay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Information
AI Thread Summary
To solve the uniform motion problem without a given distance, set up equations for each train based on their velocities and travel times. The slow freight's distance can be expressed as d = v_s * 12 hours, while the fast freight's distance is d = v_f * 10 hours. Since both trains cover the same distance, equate the two equations, leading to v_s * 12 = v_f * 10. With the relationship v_f = v_s + 10, you can solve for the velocities and subsequently determine the distance. This method effectively eliminates the need for an initial distance value.
Richay
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Okay so "The fast freight completed the trip in 10 hours while the slow freight needed 12 hours for the same trip. How long (distance) was the trip if the fast freight train was 10 kph faster than the slow freight?"

These are uniform motion problems at egual distance (which aren't difficult because I got all my other problems correct), but how am i suppose to solve for the distance? They don't give you a distance to start off with, do i make it up or is their a formula to find it?

All they gave me about distance was that the fast freight was "10kph" faster.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Set up some equations for each train. Say the slow freight has velocity v_s and the fast freight has velocity v_f.

<br /> \begin{gathered}<br /> d = v_s \cdot (12\,{\text{hours)}} \hfill \\<br /> d = v_f \cdot (10\,{\text{hours)}} \hfill \\ <br /> \end{gathered} <br />

Now, since the same distance was covered, you can set the two equations equal to each other, and distance "disappears":

<br /> v_s \cdot (12\,{\text{hours)}} = v_f \cdot (10\,{\text{hours)}}<br />

And you know that v_f = v_s + 10

Now you can solve for either velocity.

- Warren
 
Thanks for the explenation
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top